Mea Culpa -
cardcrimson - 11-07-2015
After the Northwestern debacle, I gave up on the coaching staff and the team. I humbly apologize. Right now, ours in the best team in the country, and will be after we win our next four games. Heart, talent, and coaching has been stellar.
Knowing that, I will be content (but royally pissed off) watching Stanford play in the Rose Bowl on New Years Day after watching LSU, Alabama, OSU, and Clemson play the night before for a spot in the championship.
Re: Mea Culpa -
Hank 91 - 11-07-2015
Then you should be rooting hard for LSU. I don't think a 10-2 Alabama team can get in over Stanford at 12-1, especially with (what would be) a win over Notre Dame fresh in the committee's minds. Also, they've said that conference championships are significant in their criteria. In that scenario, only an undefeated Big 12 champion would keep us out, and maybe not even then.
Re: Mea Culpa -
cardcrimson - 11-07-2015
(11-07-2015, 08:24 PM)Hank 91 link Wrote:Then you should be rooting hard for LSU. I don't think a 10-2 Alabama team can get in over Stanford at 12-1, especially with (what would be) a win over the University of Dead Fake Girlfriends fresh in the committee's minds. Also, they've said that conference championships are significant in their criteria. In that scenario, only an undefeated Big 12 champion would keep us out, and maybe not even then.
Have you noted the crimson in my moniker? Have to root for all types of crimson. . . .I just hope a 12-1 Stanford team can get in over any non-champion SEC team. I doubt that tho. . . .Love Roses!
Re: Mea Culpa -
winflop - 11-08-2015
I too had given up on this team. I hope I eat crow for it all the way to Phoenix
Re: Mea Culpa -
stupac2 - 11-08-2015
Conference championships are explicitly a tiebreaker in the playoff. A 12-1 Stanford is absolutely not getting left out for an 11-1 LSU. And that's assuming LSU wins out, which they very well may not do.