The CardBoard
How they saw it from down south - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: How they saw it from down south (/thread-10956.html)



Re: How they saw it from down south - JohnR34231 - 12-06-2015

Actually I thought the LA sports writers, usually a cynical bunch, were surprisingly upbeat about U$C despite the loss. it was kind of like, well the team played hard, but when the other team has Superman (AKA McCaffrey), what are you going to do?


Re: How they saw it from down south - washingtonismoney - 12-06-2015

SC's insane defensive strategy played a strong role.

SC BRAINTRUST:

DEFENSIVE COORDINATOR: So they're a great running team.
DBs COACH: Yeah.
DEFENSIVE COORDINATOR: A good, not a great passing team.
DL COACH: You maybe question whether they'll be effective passing the ball thirty times a game.
LB COACH: Yeah, like, Hogan's a good quarterback -- but he's no Luck. Can he carry the entire offense?
DB COACH: It seems like a risk worth taking.
DEFENSIVE COORDINATOR: So we're agreed? Six or seven guys in the box when they go into shotgun?
POSITION COACHES [in unison]: YEAHHHH!!!!!!!!


Re: How they saw it from down south - oman - 12-06-2015

What do you think is worse?  The regional (SEC) bias or the "got their team to the playoff" bias.  I think it's the latter, and I think McCaffrey gets the award if we had gotten into the playoffs.


Re: How they saw it from down south - CornFed - 12-06-2015

(12-06-2015, 09:47 AM)oman link Wrote:What do you think is worse?  The regional (SEC) bias or the "got their team to the playoff" bias.  I think it's the latter, and I think McCaffrey gets the award if we had gotten into the playoffs.

While this is, admittedly, a subjective assessment, I feel that regional bias and ignorance driven by never watching our games are the biggest factors.  The playoffs are a big lift, no doubt.


Re: How they saw it from down south - Mick - 12-06-2015

(12-06-2015, 09:47 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:SC's insane defensive strategy played a strong role.

SC BRAINTRUST:

DEFENSIVE COORDINATOR: So they're a great running team.
DBs COACH: Yeah.
DEFENSIVE COORDINATOR: A good, not a great passing team.
DL COACH: You maybe question whether they'll be effective passing the ball thirty times a game.
LB COACH: Yeah, like, Hogan's a good quarterback -- but he's no Luck. Can he carry the entire offense?
DB COACH: It seems like a risk worth taking.
DEFENSIVE COORDINATOR: So we're agreed? Six or seven guys in the box when they go into shotgun?
POSITION COACHES [in unison]: YEAHHHH!!!!!!!!


I actually wondered if it was an oddball sort of "prevent" defense, meaning that S  C's defensive coaches didn't want to give up the long run, so the plan was to concede mid-sized runs until we got close to the goal line -- and the plan didn't fail, at least in the first half.


Re: How they saw it from down south - cardcrimson - 12-06-2015

(12-06-2015, 11:05 AM)CornFed link Wrote:[quote author=oman link=topic=13932.msg146134#msg146134 date=1449420447]
What do you think is worse?  The regional (SEC) bias or the "got their team to the playoff" bias.  I think it's the latter, and I think McCaffrey gets the award if we had gotten into the playoffs.

While this is, admittedly, a subjective assessment, I feel that regional bias and ignorance driven by never watching our games are the biggest factors.  The playoffs are a big lift, no doubt.
[/quote]

Finebaum this morning said the same thing. Not getting into the playoff has doomed McCaffrey. He also admitted he didn't watch the game last night (but intends to today) as it was third fiddle to the ACC and Big Ten championship games. He did add the his automatic vote for Henry will wait until after he sees McCaffrey.


Re: How they saw it from down south - Rally - 12-06-2015

(12-06-2015, 11:37 AM)cardcrimson link Wrote:[quote author=CornFed link=topic=13932.msg146192#msg146192 date=1449425113]
[quote author=oman link=topic=13932.msg146134#msg146134 date=1449420447]
What do you think is worse?  The regional (SEC) bias or the "got their team to the playoff" bias.  I think it's the latter, and I think McCaffrey gets the award if we had gotten into the playoffs.

While this is, admittedly, a subjective assessment, I feel that regional bias and ignorance driven by never watching our games are the biggest factors.  The playoffs are a big lift, no doubt.
[/quote]

Finebaum this morning said the same thing. Not getting into the playoff has doomed McCaffrey. He also admitted he didn't watch the game last night (but intends to today) as it was third fiddle to the ACC and Big Ten championship games. He did add the his automatic vote for Henry will wait until after he sees McCaffrey.
[/quote]

Who's kidding who?  He probably mailed his vote in 2 weeks ago.