nitpicking time - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: nitpicking time (/thread-11255.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: nitpicking time (/thread-11255.html)
nitpicking time - washingtonismoney - 01-02-2016
Plaschke calls McCaffrey a man of "normal build," which is good news to the nation's women (and some men), I'm sure.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-rose-bowl-plaschke-20160102-column.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&dlvrit=53285
Re: nitpicking time - BostonCard - 01-02-2016
Since we are nitpicking, Plaschke wrote "ordinary build", which nonetheless is an odd definition of ordinary. I mean, I want an ordinary build like McCaffrey's.
BC
Re: nitpicking time - ThePassionOfTheChryst - 01-02-2016
In the BI game thread, someone attributed his "ordinary build" to steroids. I thought that was amusing.
Re: nitpicking time - CTcard - 01-02-2016
(01-02-2016, 07:17 AM)ThePassionOfTheChryst link Wrote:In the BI game thread, someone attributed his "ordinary build" to steroids. I thought that was amusing.
In every BI thread, somebody attributes Stanford players' build to steroids.
It's just what they do.
Re: nitpicking time - Nan3cy - 01-02-2016
(01-02-2016, 07:54 AM)CTcard link Wrote:[quote author=ThePassionOfTheChryst link=topic=14255.msg150470#msg150470 date=1451744236]
In the BI game thread, someone attributed his "ordinary build" to steroids. I thought that was amusing.
In every BI thread, somebody attributes Stanford players' build to steroids.
It's just what they do.
[/quote]
Sounds like the makings of a new GEICO commercial...
Re: nitpicking time - Mick - 01-09-2016
(01-02-2016, 07:54 AM)CTcard link Wrote:[quote author=ThePassionOfTheChryst link=topic=14255.msg150470#msg150470 date=1451744236]
In the BI game thread, someone attributed his "ordinary build" to steroids. I thought that was amusing.
In every BI thread, somebody attributes Stanford players' build to steroids.
It's just what they do.
[/quote]
Meaning no disrespect whatsoever, our players dont look like they take steroids. I recall seeing a Stanford recruit from some years back who ended up at USC (never really did anything) who was basically misshapen, I've seen OLs with faces that seem to small for their heads, I've worked with and played against guys who've used steroids...based upon what I've seen of the Stanford team...I just don't see it. They seem strong, physical, built, but within normal parameters.
Re: nitpicking time - CornFed - 01-09-2016
Our players don't need no stinkin' steroids.
They have The Cooling Glove. :P
Re: nitpicking time - Oasis - 01-09-2016
I'm a little late this year with my usual January post about how Plaschke should not be allowed to live. But he did say Christian is the best football player in the country, ordinary build notwithstanding, which I suppose gets him a stay until next January.
Re: nitpicking time - Hank 91 - 01-09-2016
I would really like it if the powers that be could create a CardBoard auto-correct for this columnist's name. I'd really prefer not to have to read the name here or anywhere else. Here are a few suggestions:
The Writer Without a Clue.
Everyone's Least Favorite Scribe.
The Man Who Wishes He Were Jim Murray.
The Only Man in Los Angeles Who's More Embarrassing than Charlie Sheen.
Asshat.
Any of these will do.
Re: nitpicking time - fullmetal - 01-11-2016
Plaschke = a$$cheek.
Crude, but effective?
Anagram time - Mick - 01-11-2016
(01-11-2016, 01:05 PM)fullmetal link Wrote:Plaschke = a$$cheek.
Crude, but effective?
Plaschke
Lacks Hep
Slack Hep
Sack Help
Cheapkls