The CardBoard
What went wrong in Austin - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: What went wrong in Austin (/thread-1241.html)


Re: What went wrong in Austin - washingtonismoney - 02-14-2011

Kind of funny that when they mention the loss of their former recruiting advantage in Texas, they don\'t mention the Pac-10.

Think the Longhorns could\'ve used Luck, Taylor, (Michael and Darron) Thomas, the Rodgers brothers, LaMichael James, to name just a few?

Incredibly, Stanford might not have seen the end of the Texas pipeline: Barry Browning had a good freshman season at corner and Cameron Fleming got a lot of hype as an up-and-coming tackle during his redshirt season.

Also: kind of funny that one of Brown\'s corrective actions was to hire Vinny Cerrato as an outside observer. Brown does realize that Cerrato was the totally incompetent stooge for the totally incompetent Daniel Snyder in Washington, right?


Re: What went wrong in Austin - fullmetal - 02-14-2011

Quizz wasn\'t recruited because he was 5\'8" or 5\'9".  That was Texas\'s loss for sure.

It\'ll be interesting to see if Texas recovers this season.  Recovery isn\'t guaranteed, not with a malaise as such described in the article infiltrating both players and coaches.

Re: What went wrong in Austin - Hank 91 - 02-14-2011

Quote:Kind of funny that when they mention the loss of their former recruiting advantage in Texas, they don\'t mention the Pac-10.

So maybe when Texas cited television revenue when they passed on joining the PAC-12 (or would it have been PAC-16?), they might\'ve actually been worried about losing more in-state talent to the rest of the conference. Hmm.

Re: What went wrong in Austin - Kathy - 02-15-2011

Karma

Re: What went wrong in Austin - fullmetal - 02-15-2011

Quote:Karma

Karma is somewhat hand-wavy and quasi-mystical in nature.  No, this collapse was clearly the lack of coaching focus and a dip in talent.  No karma here--just a cumulative failure starting with the graduation of real talent and the underdevelopment of what could have been talent.  They made their bed.

Re: What went wrong in Austin - slide - 02-15-2011

Garvin -- nice find, and a good read.  lots of things for fans to watch for with Stanford this spring.  

Re: What went wrong in Austin - Leftcoast - 02-15-2011

A new neighbor moved in this past weekend, my younger kids immediately made friends and I ended up chaperoning a trip to the local park for the kids while the parents unpacked.

Then I noticed the 9 yr old was wearing a gawdawful orange UT shirt.   It turns out they are UT season ticketholders and will maintain their tix while in California (working for Google).

The son explained that last year wasn\'t so fun because of all the booing - particularly at the last game he went too.  I assumed they were booing the opposing team but he corrected me to say they were booing the Longhorns!   Must have been the A&M game but it\'s gone pretty far when the fans are booing at home games in Texas.   Showers of malformed frogs and plagues of locusts can\'t be far off.

Nice folks by the way, both are UT alums and have followed some Stanford football.   Turns out they were engaged in SF after they flew out to watch the UT/Stanford game in 2000.   There was some joking about nearly returning the ring and trying for a more auspicious start after unranked Stanford beat #6 Texas 27-24 that afternoon.  

I\'ll agree to not bring up UCLA in 2010 if they agree to pretend that Stanford football history went straight from Willingham to Harbaugh with nothing of interest in between.

Re: What went wrong in Austin - CrazedZooChimp - 02-15-2011

The real key is to trick them into buying some tickets for games this fall, make them root for the local guys!

Re: What went wrong in Austin - fullmetal - 02-15-2011

The A&M game was winnable (I didn\'t hear boos, but I was in the south end zone, and it\'s a big stadium)...I bet the Iowa State game saw a lot of boos though, as perhaps the UCLA game did.

Stanford should be a much more pleasant team to root for--tell \'em it\'s never too early to set their son\'s college sights on the best university in the land...

Re: What went wrong in Austin - oman - 02-16-2011

As someone who went to Stanford and UT for grad school, of course Stanford is more pleasant to root for.  The expectations aren\'t in the same galaxy.

I\'d put the drunken intensity of a UT game in Austin (or the Rose Bowl, or in Dallas) up against just about anything.

And that burnt orange t-shirt is beautiful.

Re: What went wrong in Austin - oman - 02-16-2011

Quote:
Quote:Kind of funny that when they mention the loss of their former recruiting advantage in Texas, they don\'t mention the Pac-10.

So maybe when Texas cited television revenue when they passed on joining the PAC-12 (or would it have been PAC-16?), they might\'ve actually been worried about losing more in-state talent to the rest of the conference. Hmm.

Not really.  

Is the story out there that Texas passed on the Pac10, because at least the fans were all about trying  to get in?  

California schools have always been attractive to Texas recruits.  I think Texas would have been a big beneficiary of getting regular exposure in Southern Cal.

Re: What went wrong in Austin - tmswope - 02-17-2011

Quote:The A&M game was winnable (I didn\'t hear boos, but I was in the south end zone, and it\'s a big stadium)...I bet the Iowa State game saw a lot of boos though, as perhaps the UCLA game did.

Stanford should be a much more pleasant team to root for--tell \'em it\'s never too early to set their son\'s college sights on the best university in the land...

I went to the UCLA game.  There were a few boos (not entirely unrelated, there was quite a bit of booze), but for the most part everybody was just in complete shock.  Handling Tech in Lubbock seemed to give everyone (fans, players and coaches alike) a false sense of comfort heading into that game.  The players also probably watched quite a bit of Stanford\'s trouncing of the Bruins, and they thought, "If Stanford dominated them..."

I, too, took the Stanford undergrad/UT grad route.  And Stanford is much, much more fun to root for.