:( -
Snorlax94 - 10-09-2016
Well that was brutal. Was at the game. Talked to some old-timers about Buddy ball and Walt Harris. Got home. Took some time to decompress. Watched the recording.
In a way, the game felt slightly less disastrous on the second viewing -- Falk made some great passes and his receivers made some very good catches (mixed in with some blown coverage and missed tackles).
I am hopeful that when Marx, Taboada and Tucker(?) are healthy again, the blocking will improve. *especially* when Marx is back -- I saw multiple run plays get blown up because the fullback ran past an end or lb who eventually makes the play, and several missed pass blocks that hopefully Marx makes.
I am hopeful that when Owusu comes back it will mean another reciever getting open and fewer dropped balls.
On the second viewing, I thought the defense actually played decent for a while, and am hopeful the defense can be very good again once the corners return.
Hopefully very soon.
Re: :( -
Mick - 10-09-2016
I thought the defense was positioned properly most of the time, but I thought the tackling was mediocre on average and at times awful.
Re: :( -
Trevmiesterj - 10-09-2016
I haven't watched a replay of the game, but I am curious how the linebackers did. It seemed like the Cougar backs, when they ran, seemed to pick up extra yards all game long after the initial hit.
Re: :( -
winflop - 10-09-2016
Watched the replay with a focus on the DL & ILB. DL actually did all right, but ILBs were atrocious both in run stopping (they couldn't) and pass coverage which was beyond awful. I only watched through 35-10 because at that point the entire D was gassed and the game was effectively over.
Re: :( -
Hurlburt88 - 10-09-2016
It is really interesting how at the QB, OL, and LB positions it seems like people failed to "separate" themselves as clear starters before the season started, and now this is where we continue to have question marks. I was hopeful it was due to higher level of talent overall, but no longer believe this one bit. My current hypothesis is that at these positions we don't have the intangibles this year that deliver "intellectually brutal" performance.
Re: :( -
thunder_chik - 10-09-2016
Winning ugly (I'd classify the UCLA game as an ugly W) is bad enough; now we are LOSING ugly.
Overall, and aside from the O line problems, we look lackluster on fundamentals. Missed passes, missed tackles, missed blocks, mental mistakes. Penalties. Sloppiness. Lack of focus/awareness (e.g., botched punt return last week). Taking forever to snap the ball/get the play off. Poor management (e.g., burning time outs to avoid delay of game, punting when behind by 3 scores). Too little, too late (last nights end of the first half drive and the meaningless TD as time ran out in the second half). Did we get too distracted by all the media attention? Become complacent with our success? Or is this just the dreaded, delayed regression that was expected (but did not materialize when Luck left)? Also, I've seen no evidence of fire or desire in this team. Not sure how this gets addressed.
Re: :( -
Ratmandoo - 10-09-2016
For those of you who went to the game, how dead was the home crowd at the beginning of the game? Based on the crowd shots, it looked pretty dismal. Even when it was early, the TV shots showed fans sitting down with their arms folded waiting for things to go wrong. I know we were terrible against UW and obviously that continued on Saturday. The team didn't have any energy the entire game but the crowd didn't help. And this was the first home game with the students back.
I get that there wasn't much to cheer for as the game went on but early in the game our crowd was pathetic early in the game. It's a pretty embarrassing home field that doesn't even make the visiting team practice a silent count leading up to their games at Stanford. We all sit back and criticize the coaching and the players when things are this bad (hell we do it when we have any "ugly" loss). The least we can do is cheer these guys on as much as we can while the game is still in doubt. We owe this team that much for the past 8 years of fantastic football. I just wish I could make it to the games this year.
And rant over.
Re: :( -
BostonCard - 10-09-2016
Crowd noise was ok, but not great. Students were pretty loud early.
But there was no sustaining it. As things went south for the team, the crowd noise died down, and lots of people left in the third quarter.
BC
Re: :( -
oldalum - 10-09-2016
(10-09-2016, 08:21 PM)Ratmandoo link Wrote:It's a pretty embarrassing home field that doesn't even make the visiting team practice a silent count leading up to their games at Stanford.
In a pregame press conference, Leach characterized Stanford Stadium as one of the quietest in the conference.
Re: :( -
81alum - 10-09-2016
(10-09-2016, 08:44 PM)oldalum link Wrote:[quote author=Ratmandoo link=topic=15877.msg175323#msg175323 date=1476069690]
It's a pretty embarrassing home field that doesn't even make the visiting team practice a silent count leading up to their games at Stanford.
In a pregame press conference, Leach characterized Stanford Stadium as one of the quietest in the conference.
[/quote]
Much of that is the architecture. The aluminum upper stadium helped increase the noise a bit over the old earth stadium, but concrete or steel would be better than thin aluminum at reflecting the sound, and the lower portion sunk into the earth just deadens noise all the more. Remember they actually dug the field six feet deeper when they built the new stadium, so they increased its sound deadening properties. Perhaps our fans are not as loud, but there is little that can be done about the deadening effect of the stadium. A cantilevered roof like Husky stadium might help increase the noise--maybe some of the engineers on the Cardboard can suggest other ideas.
Re: :( -
Phogge - 10-09-2016
Kalambayi has regressed totally. The inside guys are little help, Lloyd and others make too many tackles. Constant substituting at ILB. I'd say let Barton play a lot. It should pay off next year. perhaps Branch down the road but Palma and Perez are useless. I hate the two down linemen scheme. Worked with the great Martinez last year but they have no one close to his ability now. And my God the bench was quiet too.
Re: :( -
Leftcoast - 10-09-2016
Crowd was OK in the first half but went passive as things went south. Most areas of the stadium were sparsely populated by the 8 minute mark of the 4th quarter.Â
This was the first game attended by students and they made their presence felt but seemed more socially focused rather than concentrating on the game. The band half-time show dealt with finding a new brand for the band with jokes and Kanye West songs aimed at the incoming Frosh.
The Stanford Olympians were celebrated at halftime with big cheers for Katie Ledekie and the other swimmers.Â
A team of Navy seals parachuted into the stadium with mega-sized sparklers to track them in the night sky plus a giant American flag.
So .... Lots of celebration and lots of good feelings but not a lot of it focused on the game.
Re: :( -
Snorlax94 - 10-09-2016
I agree the stadium started out feeling pretty full and then people slowly started dribbling out around halftime, and it was a ghost town halfway through the fourth quarter.
Part of it could have to do with the fact that it was Cardinal Kids Day, with free tickets for kids (with an adult) and free tickets for educators. The game ran long, so the early departures may also have to do with the late hour.
I thought the crowd was OK -- although the Leach claimed the noise came from the PA system, I thought it was the fans, and the Cougs had at least 3 false starts and a time out, with 2 of those false starts near the goal line in front of me -- opposite of the student section.
I was actually a little disappointed with the student section. I think I heard of it on this board -- that before school started Stanford made student section tickets available to local high school kids? Anyway, I thought the student section was louder for Kansas State and SC.
Many people stopped cheering around the third quarter. Although I knew it wouldn't have any effect on the outcome of the game, I stayed loud just because I thought that was the best thing to do to support the team. I swear even several Stanford fans were giving me a hard time for cheering loudly for the team during the fourth quarter.
Re: :( -
needle - 10-09-2016
You're not a true Stanford fan until you've been shushed by another Stanford fan.
Re: :( -
vataha - 10-10-2016
Throughout all of my years attendance at Stanford games going back to 1968 and having a streak of missing only 7 home games from 1968 to 1986 (away at college which ended the streak) I had been incessantly shushed,cowed and derided for standing and cheering and supporting our boys. At this years' USC game my oldest son and I were told to sit down and stop making noise by the folks behind us. (Thankfully my son had a greater sense of the big picture and asked me to let it go when I incredulously reacted with a "seriously!" to those making the request.) In fact, during the 2000 season when we hosted and beat #5 Texas when DeRonnie Pitts cartwheeled into the end zone after catching a 15-yard touchdown pass from backup quarterback Chris Lewis with 1:12 to play as Stanford rallied to defeat No. 5 Texas, 27-24. I was standing and screaming for the Cardinal defense to hold on and I was nailed in the back by a large cup of soda thrown by the wife of a former Stanford football alum who was sitting 6-7 rows up in the shady side section. I was previously asked by her husband to stop standing up because I interfered with his wife's line of sight as they sat on their hands. The thump and splash of pepsi on my back was second only to the look of satisfaction on her face as I turned around and caught her steely stare and the sense of satisfaction in her eyes. I was an employee of the Stanford athletic department at the time and had been working the game during the first half and halftime doing marketing promotions. I was wearing my game-day "uniform" and went up into the stands to watch the last quarter with my family. needless to say we were all just stunned by her temerity. Oh those shady-side memories.
Re: :( -
Mick - 10-10-2016
(10-10-2016, 12:51 AM)vataha link Wrote:Throughout all of my years attendance at Stanford games going back to 1968 and having a streak of missing only 7 home games from 1968 to 1986 (away at college which ended the streak) I had been incessantly shushed,cowed and derided for standing and cheering and supporting our boys. At this years' Under Stanford Control (again) game my oldest son and I were told to sit down and stop making noise by the folks behind us. (Thankfully my son had a greater sense of the big picture and asked me to let it go when I incredulously reacted with a "seriously!" to those making the request.) In fact, during the 2000 season when we hosted and beat #5 Texas when DeRonnie Pitts cartwheeled into the end zone after catching a 15-yard touchdown pass from backup quarterback Chris Lewis with 1:12 to play as Stanford rallied to defeat No. 5 Texas, 27-24. I was standing and screaming for the Cardinal defense to hold on and I was nailed in the back by a large cup of soda thrown by the wife of a former Stanford football alum who was sitting 6-7 rows up in the shady side section. I was previously asked by her husband to stop standing up because I interfered with his wife's line of sight as they sat on their hands. The thump and splash of pepsi on my back was second only to the look of satisfaction on her face as I turned around and caught her steely stare and the sense of satisfaction in her eyes. I was an employee of the Stanford athletic department at the time and had been working the game during the first half and halftime doing marketing promotions. I was wearing my game-day "uniform" and went up into the stands to watch the last quarter with my family. needless to say we were all just stunned by her temerity. Oh those shady-side memories.
It is a funny feeling when you get golf claps at a Stanford game, but at the Ryder Cup....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMP8a3mJRxY
Re: :( -
JohnR34231 - 10-10-2016
(10-10-2016, 12:51 AM)vataha link Wrote:Throughout all of my years attendance at Stanford games going back to 1968 and having a streak of missing only 7 home games from 1968 to 1986 (away at college which ended the streak) I had been incessantly shushed,cowed and derided for standing and cheering and supporting our boys. At this years' Under Stanford Control (again) game my oldest son and I were told to sit down and stop making noise by the folks behind us. (Thankfully my son had a greater sense of the big picture and asked me to let it go when I incredulously reacted with a "seriously!" to those making the request.) In fact, during the 2000 season when we hosted and beat #5 Texas when DeRonnie Pitts cartwheeled into the end zone after catching a 15-yard touchdown pass from backup quarterback Chris Lewis with 1:12 to play as Stanford rallied to defeat No. 5 Texas, 27-24. I was standing and screaming for the Cardinal defense to hold on and I was nailed in the back by a large cup of soda thrown by the wife of a former Stanford football alum who was sitting 6-7 rows up in the shady side section. I was previously asked by her husband to stop standing up because I interfered with his wife's line of sight as they sat on their hands. The thump and splash of pepsi on my back was second only to the look of satisfaction on her face as I turned around and caught her steely stare and the sense of satisfaction in her eyes. I was an employee of the Stanford athletic department at the time and had been working the game during the first half and halftime doing marketing promotions. I was wearing my game-day "uniform" and went up into the stands to watch the last quarter with my family. needless to say we were all just stunned by her temerity. Oh those shady-side memories.
Yeah, I remember going to games, standing up and yelling, and having the people around me look at me like I was somewhat deranged. I also remember sitting near two guys who spent the entire game discussing their relative 401(k) plans. At the end I wouldn't have been surprised if neither one knew (or cared) who won.
People who attend Stanford games seem to be of a different breed.
Re: :( -
Leftcoast - 10-10-2016
I forgot to mention ... Tiger Woods was on the sideline during the game. First time I've seen him at a Stanford football game since The Big Game where he was booed by the ×ÉÉ fans (2009).
Golden State's Klay Thompson, a WSU alum, was also at the game.
Re: :( -
TRD - 10-10-2016
(10-10-2016, 12:51 AM)vataha link Wrote:Throughout all of my years attendance at Stanford games going back to 1968 and having a streak of missing only 7 home games from 1968 to 1986 (away at college which ended the streak) I had been incessantly shushed,cowed and derided for standing and cheering and supporting our boys. At this years' Under Stanford Control (again) game my oldest son and I were told to sit down and stop making noise by the folks behind us.
I would have more outraged for Stanford stadium had I not grown up in Toronto where at a baseball game in the 80s, where a woman sitting next to me called security because I was interfering with her ability to read her book. She didn't like loud cheering 7 rows above the visitor dugout.
What was our crime? Shouting "Ricky!!" every time Ricky Henderson went to the on deck circle.
:(
Re: :( -
washingtonismoney - 10-10-2016
(10-10-2016, 04:27 AM)leftcoast link Wrote:I forgot to mention ... Tiger Woods was on the sideline during the game. First time I've seen him at a Stanford football game since The Big Game where he was booed by the ×ÉÉ fans (2009).
Wasn't he also honorary captain at the Fiesta Bowl?