Sacks - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Sacks (/thread-13304.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Sacks (/thread-13304.html)
Sacks - BostonCard - 01-03-2017
https://twitter.com/davidhaleespn/status/816309403762577408
I haven't vetted the numbers, and also starting in 2012 is rather arbitrary, other than it results in a 5-year period. However, if they hold up,it's pretty impressive.
BC
Re: Sacks - martyup - 01-03-2017
Nice. Trees bring the wood.
Re: Sacks - FarmBoy - 01-03-2017
Is it just a coincidence that 4 of the teams listed are from the Pac12? Or do Pac12 teams have really poor pass protection or play in schemes that allow more sacks?
Re: Sacks - fullmetal - 01-03-2017
Schemes. If you never run the ball, you get blitzed more :) Right?
Re: Sacks - FarmBoy - 01-03-2017
I don't watch much non-Pac12 football, but doesn't the Big12 run as much "air raid" or more than us? But I guess we on margin have better defenders?