WBB: This year versus recent years - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: WBB: This year versus recent years (/thread-1352.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: WBB: This year versus recent years (/thread-1352.html)
WBB: This year versus recent years - M T - 03-26-2011
I thought I\'d look at some stats of this year versus recent Stanford teams. This year has good numbers across the board, but often not the best single year. This year, the shooting percentage for 2 pointers is much better (Thanks, O team!). But, look at that trend in scoring margin!
| Year | Gm | Pt | A/FG | 3/Att | 2Pt% | 3Pt% | FT% | OR% | DR% | Margin | Pt | A/FG | 3/2A | 2Pt% | 3Pt% | FT% | OR% | DR% | Players | |
| 2011 | 33 | 80.0 | 61% | 29% | 55% | 36% | 75% | 42% | 70% | 25.2 | 54.8 | 48% | 31% | 36% | 28% | 64% | 30% | 58% | Pohlen,Pedersen, C. Ogwumike,N. Ogwumike,La Rocque | |
| 2010 | 38 | 76.1 | 62% | 30% | 52% | 34% | 74% | 41% | 71% | 22.2 | 53.9 | 44% | 26% | 37% | 25% | 61% | 29% | 59% | Ogwumike,Pedersen,Appel,Pohlen,Gold-Onwude | |
| 2009 | 38 | 76.1 | 65% | 29% | 53% | 33% | 67% | 44% | 72% | 20.3 | 55.8 | 51% | 27% | 36% | 33% | 69% | 28% | 56% | Pederson,Appel,Pohlen,Harmon,Gold-Onwude | |
| 2008 | 38 | 75.1 | 61% | 29% | 51% | 33% | 72% | 37% | 71% | 18.7 | 56.4 | 50% | 27% | 38% | 29% | 67% | 29% | 63% | Wiggins,Appel,Pedersen,Hones,Gold-Onwude | |
| 2007 | 34 | 71.3 | 64% | 22% | 49% | 33% | 66% | 37% | 71% | 14.2 | 57.1 | 52% | 26% | 36% | 32% | 67% | 29% | 63% | Smith,Newlin,Harmon,Wiggins,Hones | |
| 2006 | 34 | 78.6 | 58% | 28% | 50% | 40% | 68% | 35% | 68% | 15.7 | 62.9 | 56% | 27% | 40% | 29% | 70% | 32% | 65% | Wiggins,Smith,Rappahahn,Harmon,Gold-Onwude | |
| 2005 | 35 | 77.8 | 58% | 28% | 52% | 38% | 75% | 38% | 68% | 21.9 | 56.0 | 55% | 27% | 37% | 29% | 68% | 32% | 62% | Wiggins,Smith,Suminski,Thiel,Borchardt,Kimyacioglu | |
| 2004 | 34 | 70.4 | 63% | 36% | 48% | 38% | 81% | 36% | 67% | 11.9 | 58.4 | 53% | 25% | 40% | 32% | 66% | 33% | 64% | Powell,Suminski,Borchardt,Kimyacioglu,Thiel | |
| 32 | 70.7 | 62% | 35% | 50% | 36% | 77% | 38% | 71% | 11.8 | 58.9 | 53% | 27% | 41% | 32% | 67% | 29% | 63% | Suminski,Thiel,King,Perryman,Kimyacioglu | ||
| 2002 | 35 | 80.3 | 65% | 31% | 52% | 39% | 72% | 40% | 68% | 18.9 | 61.4 | 53% | 26% | 35% | 32% | 67% | 32% | 60% | Yamasaki,Powell,Donaphin,Suminski,Thiel | |
| 2001 | 30 | 73.4 | 60% | 28% | 48% | 37% | 72% | 39% | 64% | 5.1 | 68.3 | 61% | 28% | 42% | 32% | 67% | 36% | 61% | Powell,Yamasaki,King,Donaphin,St.Clair | |
| 2000 | 30 | 74.3 | 58% | 30% | 49% | 41% | 70% | 37% | 64% | 7.8 | 66.4 | 61% | 27% | 43% | 33% | 69% | 36% | 63% | Moos,Flores,Carey,Donaphin,St.Clair | |
| 1999 | 30 | 71.7 | 64% | 27% | 47% | 34% | 70% | 39% | 64% | 2.2 | 69.6 | 57% | 23% | 42% | 30% | 68% | 36% | 61% | Yamasaki,Moos,Freuen,Flores,Dimson |
3/Att 3pt Attempts per field goal attempt
2Pt% Shooting percentage for 2 point shots (excluding 3pt shots)
DR% % rebounded of def. rebound chances
OR% ditto on offensive end
Re: WBB: This year versus recent years - washingtonismoney - 03-26-2011
Scoring margin is the best statistic available to predict future performance. The trend is an exciting one.
(obviously you have to adjust for pace and quality of opposition, but the basic idea still holds.)
Re: WBB: This year versus recent years - JeffInCorvallis - 03-26-2011
Unfortunately the quality of Pac-10 opposition this year (and the last several years) has been weak. Â We play a tough non-conference schedule but UCLA was the only conference team that really pushed us this season.