AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
Durty Nelly - 08-23-2017
https://twitter.com/RJ_Abeytia/status/900244271508340736
Devery Hamilton likely to start.
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
BobK - 08-23-2017
No Bo Peek either
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
JohnR34231 - 08-23-2017
(08-23-2017, 08:13 AM)BobK link Wrote:No Bo Peek either
No "he must have lost his sheep" jokes, please.
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
OutsiderFan - 08-23-2017
Wade-Perry is there. Would think he has to be the backup to Phillips if Peek isn't available.
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
kuz - 08-23-2017
(08-23-2017, 08:35 AM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:Wade-Perry is there. Would think he has to be the backup to Phillips if Peek isn't available.
Mike Williams is the backup NT, not Peek. But I still doubt that they burn Wade-Perry's redshirt.
At the Risk of Sounding Snarky, the Change Was Inevitable Anyway - AncientCityIndian - 08-23-2017
Better to get his feet wet against Rice than to replace Hall against USC in the second half for his first ever sustained playing time. ;)
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
donkey687 - 08-23-2017
anyone know if this is injury related? or discipline related? I hope the latter and nothing too serious of an infraction that lasts beyond one game.
I would think a banged up player would still travel with the team for the experience. A suspended player would not travel.
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
Fuzzy Dunlop - 08-23-2017
(08-23-2017, 11:17 AM)donkey687 link Wrote:I would think a banged up player would still travel with the team for the experience.
I'd think that depends on the injury. I imagine it would be easier to treat the injury at Stanford's facilities. Shaw does seem like the type of coach who would recognize what an amazing opportunity traveling to Sydney is and would do everything he could to allow a banged up player to come, but if the player ultimately will heal faster at home, that might be the dispositive factor.
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
fullmetal - 08-23-2017
I wonder if the injury contraindicates a transoceanic flight :( I'm sad for those guys having to stay home...that is not good at all. And I'm sure Shaw would have let them travel if he could have.
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
CTcard - 08-23-2017
(08-23-2017, 11:17 AM)donkey687 link Wrote:anyone know if this is injury related? or discipline related? I hope the latter ...
Interesting question. The latter might be better than the former for the kid, but could never bring myself to hope for it.
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
needle - 08-23-2017
If it was an injury, I think Shaw would come out and say so.
The other option is a family emergency.
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
Snorlax94 - 08-24-2017
Man, I am very curious to learn the reason.
Here's an article with a little bit of information as I do not have access to scout.com
https://www.diehards.com/stanford/report-stanford-right-tackle-t-hall-not-make-trip-australia-cardinal
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
DC 86 - 08-24-2017
(08-24-2017, 02:31 AM)Snorlax94 link Wrote:Man, I am very curious to learn the reason.
Here's an article with a little bit of information as I do not have access to scout.com
https://www.diehards.com/stanford/report-stanford-right-tackle-t-hall-not-make-trip-australia-cardinal
Based on Shaw's no/comment it could be inferred that it's not injury-related.
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
murky - 08-24-2017
Maybe he wanted to watch the eclipse.
Re: AT Hall did not travel to Sydney -
Spiny_Norman - 08-24-2017
(08-24-2017, 12:04 PM)murky link Wrote:Maybe he wanted to watch the eclipse.
Michael Rector was suspended for disciplinary reasons during training camp two years ago. Heard that he broke curfew to watch a Taylor Swift concert.