So much for compliments. . . . - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: So much for compliments. . . . (/thread-14806.html)

---

So much for compliments. . . . - cardcrimson - 11-05-2017

Man, I "+1'd " lex's comment on another thread, and the thread gets locked. That'll teach me. Only bitterness and condemnation from here on out. . . .

---

Re: So much for compliments. . . . - qwerty49 - 11-06-2017

I might get downvoted or censured for this but this community seems relatively thin-skinned, certainly compared to the free-for-all that developed on one of the other sites. And that definitely extends to Board Ops.
But I get it, it’s a different sandbox with different rules, and we all have to adapt. And it’s free, which is refreshing.
I just wish the little software substitutions, which I find rather juvenile, would go away.

---

Re: So much for compliments. . . . - Trevmiesterj - 11-06-2017

HEY BUDDY, WHO YOU CALLING THIN-SKINNED?  YOU GOT A PROBLEM?

Actually, I disagree with this assessment and quite frankly, I appreciate the tone of the community here.  There is nothing wrong with a few CC&Rs to keep the neighborhood friendly and *relatively* troll free.  While a minor grouse, I do agree that the auto-script changes (such as cal) that make the posts more difficult to read.

---

Re: So much for compliments. . . . - admin - 11-06-2017

The lock was to prevent more discussion—denigration—of someone who's not on the board.

---

Re: So much for compliments. . . . - jacketree - 11-06-2017

Wait a minute.  I don't think Uma Thurman has ever been on this board and that did not prevent a certain individual from discussing - denigrating - her proboscis as one example.  I guess some animals are more equal than others around here.  Makes sense; that's life. :P

---