Stanford #15, USC #9. - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford #15, USC #9. (/thread-15048.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford #15, USC #9. (/thread-15048.html)
Stanford #15, USC #9. - cardcrimson - 11-26-2017
Would be great to beat three top ten teams pretty much in a row. Tough road to hoe, tho.
Re: Stanford #15, U$C #9. - winflop - 11-26-2017
I'm all in for FOUR - include the Fiesta Bowl after we take care of business on Friday.
Re: Stanford #15, U$C #9. - cardcrimson - 11-26-2017
Great point!
Re: Stanford #15, U$C #9. - French Rage - 11-26-2017
And SDSU is #25 in the Coaches Poll. So we've played 5 top 25 teams, with a 6th coming Friday.
Re: Stanford #15, U$C #9. - qwerty49 - 11-26-2017
IIRC if ND drops below #14 they cannot be considered for a NY6 Bowl.
Re: Stanford #15, U$C #9. - BostonCard - 11-26-2017
(11-26-2017, 12:07 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:Would be great to beat three top ten teams pretty much in a row. Tough road to hoe, tho.
Um, Cal is unranked and they were in between our wins against UW and ND. So, it would be great if we beta three ranked teams in four games (or, four in five).
BC
Re: Stanford #15, U$C #9. - JJJ - 11-26-2017
fwiw, these two guys both think Stanford vs Michigan in Holiday Bowl for now.
http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/21568451/week-13-college-football-bowl-projections-2017
Re: Stanford #15, U$C #9. - cardcrimson - 11-26-2017
(11-26-2017, 04:02 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=cardcrimson link=topic=18168.msg215074#msg215074 date=1511723265]
Would be great to beat three top ten teams pretty much in a row. Tough road to hoe, tho.
Um, ×ÉÉ is unranked and they were in between our wins against UW and ND. So, it would be great if we beta three ranked teams in four games (or, four in five).
BC
[/quote]
Hence the words "pretty much in a row". Thought last week's Big Game was self evident to anyone that followed Stanford football. Guess not.
Re: Stanford #15, U$C #9. - TRD - 11-26-2017
I wonder what the game plan is to slow down Darnold this time?
Re: Stanford #15, U$C #9. - Mick - 11-26-2017
(11-26-2017, 06:00 PM)TRD link Wrote:I wonder what the game plan is to slow down Darnold this time?
WSU put a ton of pressure on Darnold. One of his starting Ols were out, two more went out during the game. Pressure rattled Darnold, though. He also fumbled against WSU.
Re: Stanford #15, U$C #9. - TreesAndBirds - 11-26-2017
FWIW.....We are the highest ranked 3 loss team.
Re: Stanford #15, U$C #9. - Goose - 11-26-2017
(11-26-2017, 08:14 PM)TreesAndBirds link Wrote:FWIW.....We are the highest ranked 3 loss team.Which is quite nice. Let's not become the highest ranked four loss team :).