Scout class ranking - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Scout class ranking (/thread-17024.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Scout class ranking (/thread-17024.html)
Scout class ranking - Phogge - 12-20-2018
Has Stanford 18th but is listing 23 commits including Lush, Jones and Sanborn. Too bad that they didn't recruit a Chase for those senior citizens who made coffee for their parents.
RE: Scout class ranking - CTcard - 12-20-2018
(12-20-2018, 02:55 PM)Phogge Wrote: Has Stanford 18th but is listing 23 commits including Lush, Jones and Sanborn. Too bad that they didn't recruit a Chase for those senior citizens who made coffee for their parents.
They also had Stanford 18th before they listed Lush, Jones, and Sanborn. It could be they aren't giving points for those three, or it could be that others added about the same amount.
Rivals has Stanford at 19th, with Sanborn listed - not Jones and Lush.
RE: Scout class ranking - BostonCard - 12-20-2018
Also, we are third in the conference behind Oregon and Washington, and ahead of USC, who did not, in the end, overtake us.
BC
RE: Scout class ranking - SamuelMcF - 12-20-2018
(12-20-2018, 11:23 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Also, we are third in the conference behind Oregon and Washington, and ahead of USC, who did not, in the end, overtake us.
BC
There's another signing period. They will.
RE: Scout class ranking - CTcard - 12-21-2018
(12-20-2018, 11:36 PM)SamuelMcF Wrote:(12-20-2018, 11:23 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Also, we are third in the conference behind Oregon and Washington, and ahead of USC, who did not, in the end, overtake us.
BC
There's another signing period. They will.
There appear to be three high profile guys they are still hopeful about ATH McCoy, CB Steele, WR Ford.
However, there is grumbling in the southland.
[UCLA's recruiting seems to be a bigger problem.]
RE: Scout class ranking - JohnR34231 - 12-21-2018
(12-21-2018, 07:20 AM)CTcard Wrote:(12-20-2018, 11:36 PM)SamuelMcF Wrote:(12-20-2018, 11:23 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Also, we are third in the conference behind Oregon and Washington, and ahead of USC, who did not, in the end, overtake us.
BC
There's another signing period. They will.
There appear to be three high profile guys they are still hopeful about ATH McCoy, CB Steele, WR Ford.
However, there is grumbling in the southland.
[UCLA's recruiting seems to be a bigger problem.]
Kelly's recruiting style at Oregon was not so much trying to get the big fish, but get the smaller ones and coach them up. Obviously, it worked pretty well.
I wonder if that is going to also be true at UCLA, and if it is, if the LaLa Land types realize and accept this.
RE: Scout class ranking - CTcard - 12-21-2018
(12-21-2018, 07:55 AM)JohnR34231 Wrote: Kelly's recruiting style at Oregon was not so much trying to get the big fish, but get the smaller ones and coach them up.
Kelly's recruiting classes at Oregon. National Rank/Pac Rank (by 247 composite)
2009 #30/#4 0 five star, 4 four stars
2010 #12/#2 1 five star, 10 four stars
2011 #12/#2 1 five star, 8 four stars
2012 #14/#3 1 five star, 10 four stars
and he was at least partially responsible for,
2013 #19/#4 1 five star, 7 four stars
At UCLA (so far)
2019 #48/#8 0 five star, 1 four star