We can beat UW - Printable Version

We can beat UW - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: We can beat UW (/thread-18267.html)

We can beat UW - donkey687 - 10-04-2019

I think Oregon has a better offense and defense than UW. If the Stanford defense can play as well as it did at home against Oregon and Northwestern, we have a shot. Better QB play than we had against Oregon and winning the turnover battle will allow us to win.

RE: We can beat UW - martyup - 10-04-2019

If the weenies can beat the dogs in their doghouse . . .

RE: We can beat UW - qwerty49 - 10-04-2019

(10-04-2019, 08:42 AM)martyup Wrote: If the weenies can beat the dogs in their doghouse . . .

LOL lightning delayed that game almost 3 hrs so most of the dawg home crowd left.

And the weenies had their starting QB fully healthy.

But most importantly the weenies have an absolute stud ILB in Patterson. Dude makes plays.

RE: We can beat UW - OutsiderFan - 10-04-2019

(10-04-2019, 10:06 AM)qwerty49 Wrote:
(10-04-2019, 08:42 AM)martyup Wrote: If the weenies can beat the dogs in their doghouse . . .

LOL lightning delayed that game almost 3 hrs so most of the dawg home crowd left.

And the weenies had their starting QB fully healthy.

But most importantly the weenies have an absolute stud ILB in Patterson. Dude makes plays.

Who is Patterson? Evan Weaver is Cal's stud ILB. Though he and his teammates performed poorly on defense against ASU.

RE: We can beat UW - BobK - 10-04-2019

I’m sure he meant weaver.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ricefootball/status/1179865759012589571

I post this having no clue if accepted to the Stanford grad school of his choice or not. And yes non acceptance certainly happens

RE: We can beat UW - martyup - 10-04-2019

(10-04-2019, 10:06 AM)qwerty49 Wrote:
(10-04-2019, 08:42 AM)martyup Wrote: If the weenies can beat the dogs in their doghouse . . .

LOL lightning delayed that game almost 3 hrs so most of the dawg home crowd left.

So, our home game crowd will be about the same as the Husky crowd that actually watched Cal beat UW. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

RE: We can beat UW - Bruce Wang - 10-04-2019

(10-04-2019, 08:42 AM)martyup Wrote: If the weenies can beat the dogs in their doghouse . . .

RE: We can beat UW - qwerty49 - 10-04-2019

(10-04-2019, 10:21 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote:
(10-04-2019, 10:06 AM)qwerty49 Wrote:
(10-04-2019, 08:42 AM)martyup Wrote: If the weenies can beat the dogs in their doghouse . . .

LOL lightning delayed that game almost 3 hrs so most of the dawg home crowd left.

And the weenies had their starting QB fully healthy.

But most importantly the weenies have an absolute stud ILB in Patterson. Dude makes plays.

Who is Patterson? Evan Weaver is Cal's stud ILB. Though he and his teammates performed poorly on defense against ASU.

Yes, sorry, meant Weaver. His worst game is better than what we are generally producing.

RE: We can beat UW - BostonCard - 10-06-2019

(10-04-2019, 08:02 AM)donkey687 Wrote: I think Oregon has a better offense and defense than UW. If the Stanford defense can play as well as it did at home against Oregon and Northwestern, we have a shot. Better QB play than we had against Oregon and winning the turnover battle will allow us to win.

Well called.

BC

RE: We can beat UW - newguy - 10-06-2019

with all due respect donkey, the Huskies are just too strong for us. we don't have a chance.

RE: We can beat UW - Mick - 10-06-2019

(10-06-2019, 03:38 AM)newguy Wrote: with all due respect donkey, the Huskies are just too strong for us. we don't have a chance.

When was the last time Stanford beat a team to which they were a 16.5 point (or better) underdog? 2007?

RE: We can beat UW - yvonne - 10-06-2019

Keep in mind there have been many fewer times that Stanford has been a 16.5 point underdog.

RE: We can beat UW - newguy - 10-07-2019

(10-06-2019, 06:15 AM)Mick Wrote:
(10-06-2019, 03:38 AM)newguy Wrote: with all due respect donkey, the Huskies are just too strong for us. we don't have a chance.

When was the last time Stanford beat a team to which they were a 16.5 point (or better) underdog? 2007?

who did we beat in that game? that's so long ago, i can't even remember.

RE: We can beat UW - qwerty49 - 10-07-2019

(10-07-2019, 04:14 AM)newguy Wrote:
(10-06-2019, 06:15 AM)Mick Wrote:
(10-06-2019, 03:38 AM)newguy Wrote: with all due respect donkey, the Huskies are just too strong for us. we don't have a chance.

When was the last time Stanford beat a team to which they were a 16.5 point (or better) underdog? 2007?

who did we beat in that game? that's so long ago, i can't even remember.

Are you serious? Hint: Tavita Pritchard was our QB.

RE: We can beat UW - BostonCard - 10-07-2019

(10-07-2019, 07:12 AM)qwerty49 Wrote:
(10-07-2019, 04:14 AM)newguy Wrote: who did we beat in that game? that's so long ago, i can't even remember.

Are you serious? Hint: Tavita Pritchard was our QB.

I would guess sarcasm, but agree it might be a bit ambiguous.

BC

RE:UW has the best D we face until ND - OL84 - 10-07-2019

Happy Randoms:

Per Pac-12.com, UW has better D stats than Cal or any other P-12 school that remains on the schedule. Remarkable.

So many gratifying performances:

Even allowing for one game anomalies, the growth the competitiveness of the freshmen lineman is beyond any reasonable expectation.

Scarlett is making them look good by making the first man miss with his jab steps and decisive cuts.

Mills is showing his strength and confidence.

Wilson looks like he wants to given "the damn ball," and I love it.

KB Kelly looks like the big find frosh, and 11 looked more like himself.

The DL is stout as hoped.

Perhaps most hopefully, Robinson competed at a level he has never shown before, running downhill and reading like an ILB for the first time IMHO.

Finally, the pass game used quicker routes, hitches and quick screens (rather than the slow kind) to great effect). Dare I say we looked like the better coached team? Maybe everyone took a few weeks to rise above the adversity, and there is some hope of a better season ahead, despite the tough schedule.

UCLA is must win, the weakest team remaining in our bowl math.

RE: We can beat UW - newguy - 10-09-2019

(10-07-2019, 07:23 AM)BostonCard Wrote:
(10-07-2019, 07:12 AM)qwerty49 Wrote:
(10-07-2019, 04:14 AM)newguy Wrote: who did we beat in that game? that's so long ago, i can't even remember.

Are you serious? Hint: Tavita Pritchard was our QB.

I would guess sarcasm, but agree it might be a bit ambiguous.

BC

it was irony, inspired by fond memories.

RE: UW has the best D we face until ND - JohnR34231 - 10-09-2019

(10-07-2019, 02:45 PM)OL84 Wrote: Happy Randoms:

Per Pac-12.com, UW has better D stats than Cal or any other P-12 school that remains on the schedule. Remarkable.

So many gratifying performances:

Even allowing for one game anomalies, the growth the competitiveness of the freshmen lineman is beyond any reasonable expectation.

Scarlett is making them look good by making the first man miss with his jab steps and decisive cuts.

Mills is showing his strength and confidence.

Wilson looks like he wants to given "the damn ball," and I love it.

KB Kelly looks like the big find frosh, and 11 looked more like himself.

The DL is stout as hoped.

Perhaps most hopefully, Robinson competed at a level he has never shown before, running downhill and reading like an ILB for the first time IMHO.

Finally, the pass game used quicker routes, hitches and quick screens (rather than the slow kind) to great effect). Dare I say we looked like the better coached team? Maybe everyone took a few weeks to rise above the adversity, and there is some hope of a better season ahead, despite the tough schedule.

UCLA is must win, the weakest team remaining in our bowl math.

Petersen admitted Stanford was the better coached team.
https://247sports.com/college/washington/Article/Washington-Huskies-UW-Football-Head-Coach-Chris-Petersen-out-coached-Stanford-Cardinal-Dawgman-podcast-136658432/