USC flips fall decision - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: Emergency (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-11.html)
+--- Forum: Covid-19 (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-12.html)
+--- Thread: USC flips fall decision (/thread-19993.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: Emergency (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-11.html)
+--- Forum: Covid-19 (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-12.html)
+--- Thread: USC flips fall decision (/thread-19993.html)
USC flips fall decision - chrisk - 07-02-2020
Will have only 10-20% in person classes, similar to UCLA model, rather than having most students on campus.
How can these schools justify fielding football teams?
RE: USC flips fall decision - Farm93 - 07-02-2020
NCAA noted very early that in person classes would be required to be able to have sports.
If it is too risky for students to attend classes, their primary reason to attend school, then it would be unacceptable to attend practices and games.
The whole NCAA fall effort is likely just waiting for the next formal meeting for a vote at this stage.
The California schools now going the hybrid route will be enough to stop the NCAA even is other major states were OK. And they aren’t OK FWIW.
RE: USC flips fall decision - magnus - 07-02-2020
Is it possible USC is only going to 10-20% instead of 0 to stay eligible for sports?
Cynical view, yeah.