The CardBoard
Outside Topic ASU loses heartbreaker to USC - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Outside Topic ASU loses heartbreaker to USC (/thread-20811.html)



ASU loses heartbreaker to USC - fullmetal - 11-07-2020

After controlling the game for most of regulation, ASU took a 13 pt lead into the 4th quarter.  When U$C lost a fumble to cap their 60 yard drive (11:16 left in the 4Q), ASU decided to control the clock and run the ball three consecutive plays before punting (sound familiar?).

U$C proceeded to move down the field on the strength of explosive plays, but even with 3:35 left in the game, ESPN had projected ASU to win with 99% confidence after ASU sacked Kedon Slovis at the ASU 23 yd line.  Two plays later, U$C threw for a 26 yd touchdown.

U$C recovered the ensuing onside kick at their 45 yd line.

Then U$C scored a touchdown on a 4th and 9 from the ASU 21.

Okay, U$C is up one point with 1:20 left in the game.  ASU should be able to kick a FG and win it, right?

ASU throws for 18 yds on first down.  They proceed to fire four subsequent incomplete passes despite having a dual-threat QB who ran for 111 yards (10.1 ypc) and turn the ball over on downs.

U$C kneels twice to ice the game, 28-27.

What an interesting game...though not an impressive season debut for the presumptive Pac-12 South leader.  Just U$C doing U$C things


RE: ASU loses heartbreaker to USC - Farm93 - 11-07-2020

The game was close and entertaining, so that's good for the ratings I guess.

ASU had multiple opportunities to end the game on defense.   Jumping offsides with a QB clap on 4th down, not once but twice late in the 4th quarter was just hard to believe.   When not jumping offsides, the ASU D allowing easy long throws to be completed when up by a bunch was also hard to watch. 

USC did enough to win, but not enough to start joining the conversation for that 4th CFP ticket.    A win should be a win, but in this CFP pageant the wins need to pass the eye test.   This one seemed to miss that subjective standard.