A new bowl game - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: A new bowl game (/thread-21056.html)

---

A new bowl game - BobK - 12-03-2020

A bowl game for soon to be 3-2 Stanford :)

https://twitter.com/bonaguraespn/status/1334633887008342021?s=21

---

RE: A new bowl game - PalmTree - 12-03-2020

(12-03-2020, 04:57 PM)BobK Wrote:  A bowl game for soon to be 3-2 Stanford :)

https://twitter.com/bonaguraespn/status/1334633887008342021?s=21

I'd be down with a game against an SEC opponent...

---

RE: A new bowl game - Phogge - 12-03-2020

I would love to play Army. The few Stanford OLB's and DE's would have a handful with the option. Army might run for 600 yards. I say hire the Army coach and fool the hell out of the rest of the Pac 12.

---

RE: A new bowl game - Row80Critic - 12-03-2020

Washington looked vulnerable vs Utah and may be looking forward to Oregon next week.  I'd say 3-2 is not out of the question.  Would 3-2 get Stanford a bowl invitation in 2020?

---

RE: A new bowl game - Maple Leaf - 12-03-2020

(12-03-2020, 07:08 PM)Phogge Wrote:  I would love to play Army. The few Stanford OLB's and DE's would have a handful with the option. Army might run for 600 yards. I say hire the Army coach and fool the hell out of the rest of the Pac 12.

Think of the money Muir would save with the Army offense playbook in terms of printing and data storage.  I am sure the number of plays in the Army playbook is well south of 600 or 6,000 or 60,000 whatever the number is now.

Add in the Single Wing to Army's current playbook and watch Stanford cut their own football tv package.

---