The CardBoard
Stanford and NIL - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford and NIL (/thread-25638.html)



Stanford and NIL - 82lsju - 06-13-2025

from an email from the AD on the House settlement



RE: Stanford and NIL - M T - 06-13-2025

Before you pull out your checkbook thinking you are contributing to "additional scholarships", consider
(SI.COM)
Quote:According to the terms of the House settlement, “The full cost-of-attendance dollar value of any new or incremental athletic scholarships — that were not previously permitted by NCAA Division I rules — up to two million five hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000.00) ("the Athletic Scholarship Cap") will count against the [revenue-sharing] Pool.”

The article suggests that adding any scholarships is money spent unwisely if the goal is to improve the team's performance.  More so at an expensive school.


RE: Stanford and NIL - BobK - 06-13-2025

Yes you can contribute to the sport you choose. That’s also in the letter. It’s a long letter


RE: Stanford and NIL - BostonCard - 06-13-2025

Personally, I struggle to see how revenue sharing (AKA paying athletes to play sports in college) constitutes a charitable donation.  Maybe the "additional scholarships" but the rest seems like a stretch of the spirit of the charitable deduction even if the letter of the law is not violated.

BC


RE: Stanford and NIL - Treebound - 06-13-2025

So how does this all fit in (or not) with Lifetime Cardinal?   As for the SI article, a scholarship at Stanford is more expensive than an in state scholarship at a school like Univ of Texas.  How does that delta apply to all of this and the $2.5?  This whole thing is a mess and needs to get blown up, imho.


RE: Stanford and NIL - TonyLima - 06-14-2025

(06-13-2025, 04:01 PM)BostonCard Wrote:  Personally, I struggle to see how revenue sharing (AKA paying athletes to play sports in college) constitutes a charitable donation.  Maybe the "additional scholarships" but the rest seems like a stretch of the spirit of the charitable deduction even if the letter of the law is not violated.

BC

Guess: when we donate to Stanford athletics, that’s a donation to Stanford. Tax deductible. Maybe revenue sharing falls under the same umbrella.


RE: Stanford and NIL - BostonCard - 06-14-2025

I mean, it’s possible to do all sorts of gymnastics to justify it, but that’s not the spirit of a charitable deduction.

BC