The CardBoard
2026 Stanford at Louisville Predictions Thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: 2026 Stanford at Louisville Predictions Thread (/thread-26376.html)



2026 Stanford at Louisville Predictions Thread - george - 10-27-2026

What do we think, can we get Jeff Brohm fired?

Also, how much nickname mileage are we gonna get out this matchup?  Can't wait to see how folks manage that extra S.  Speaking of nicknames, DON'T FORGET TO VOTE!  (we aren't getting as much participation in the nickname voting as I'd hoped).


RE: 2026 Stanford at Louisville Predictions Thread - rogpodge - 10-27-2026

https://x.com/RedditCFB/status/2115133798480495038?a=RITFtKW6imM6dhoHW70&s=09


RE: 2026 Stanford at Louisville Predictions Thread - ADPinWDC - 10-27-2026

ENCORE at LOUV?  
Analysts are with LOUV (4-3) 95%+
https://www.espn.com/college-football/ga...louisville

ESPN SP+ has LOUV at #26 and Stanford at #110. They beat SMU.  
And bring a very potent Rush / Pass Offense. Without Matt Rose at LB, this will be tough.  
https://www.espn.com/college-football/st...-fbs-teams

Their strange loss @NCST was with three fumbles lost.  
Losing to OleMiss by just 3, is not a downtick. 41-38.  
And they lost to a very good WAKE team, as we found out.

ENCORE at LOUV?  
Analysts are with LOUV (4-3) 95%+
https://www.espn.com/college-football/ga...louisville

ESPN SP+ has LOUV at #26 and Stanford at #110. They beat SMU.  
And bring a very potent Rush / Pass Offense. Without Matt Rose at LB, this will be tough.  
https://www.espn.com/college-football/st...-fbs-teams

Their strange loss @NCST was with three fumbles lost.  
Losing to OleMiss by just 3, is not a downtick. 41-38.  
And they lost to a very good WAKE team, as we found out.


RE: 2026 Stanford at Louisville Predictions Thread - BostonCard - 10-27-2026

[Image: HVqlVP8WoAEoW3X?format=jpg&name=large]

We are outliers, and not in a good way.

BC