Re: Men's: Arizona 56, Stanford 43 -
Hurlburt88 - 02-04-2012
I missed this game, but will state the obvious: how can a team that played Syracuse so tough now look so mediocre? Failing to improve and adjust through the season??? Eric Reveno looking increasingly attractive as coaching alternative!!!
:(
Re: Men's: Arizona 56, Stanford 43 - gtrplyr1 - 02-04-2012
What I wouldn't give to see Reveno in Maples Pavilion wearing cardinal and white...
Re: Men's: Arizona 56, Stanford 43 -
washingtonismoney - 02-04-2012
(02-04-2012, 05:13 PM)Card Fan 13 link Wrote:What I wouldn't give to see Reveno in Maples Pavilion wearing cardinal and white...
We probably need a change, but I don't think Reveno's it. He's never finished above third in (typically) one-team conference.
Re: Men's: Arizona 56, Stanford 43 -
Hank 91 - 02-04-2012
Earlier this week ESPN Classic ran the Arizona at Stanford game from 1989. (Some might remember that was the game played during the first week of January when the students, including me, still weren't back from break. Montgomery was furious about the scheduling and made a plea to the students who would be out of town to give their passes to those who would be around.) Lichti went for a career high 35 points (guarded much of the time by Kenny Lofton, by the way) and he was matched by Arizona's Sean Elliot. I loved that team: Lichti, Terry Taylor, Andrew Vlahov, Howard Wright, Eric Reveno, plus bench players Brian McSweeney, Derek Bruton, Scott Meinart, and a freshman named Adam Keefe.
It was a great trip down memory lane, but the sad part was obvious. Stanford-Arizona used to be a day I marked on my calendar every year, it used to be the biggest game on the west coast. What, in god's name, has happened?
Re: Men's: Arizona 56, Stanford 43 - gtrplyr1 - 02-04-2012
(02-04-2012, 05:38 PM)garvin link Wrote:His lifetime record in Portland is 84-93. That doesn't scream out HIRE ME!
Fair enough. But I'm eager as you-know-what to get Dawkins out of here and any change seems all right at this point. I also think it would be beneficial (but not necessary) to hire a Stanford Man, who we know understands the school culture and what it takes to win here. David Shaw's early success certainly suggests that hiring an alumnus can pay dividends right away.