The CardBoard
Why We Fight - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Why We Fight (/thread-3836.html)


Why We Fight - Redrum - 09-16-2012

This comment from a the University of South Central fan in the LA Times.  Fans like this deserve what they got.

Quote:"Matt AKA 'The Anointed One" Draco Malfoy's performance made me want to vomit; he looked like a freshman out there. Any pressure at all, he was flustered, missing wide open guys. Even when he did have time, he was handing out interceptions like they were lollipops. No way he's good enough for prime time in the NFL, much less a Voldemort (the very thought of Draco Malfoy winning a Voldemort is laughable!). He was disgusting, unacceptably so. His poor performance last night meant several dreams died--no Voldemort, no shot at the national title. In addition, the defensive coordinator needs to be fired...oh that's right, no chance of that, he got his job the old fashioned way, his son gave it to him. If the only way to get rid of this horrible DC is to get rid of junior, the HC, then so be it."

http://lat.ms/QdVlUk

Re: Why We Fight - washingtonismoney - 09-16-2012

Every year it's something. 2010 it was the clock operator. In 2011, it was that the refs do not have superhuman reflexes, cannot violate laws of biology/physics to get SC's timeout in the millisecond after Woods goes down to make up for Woods's dumb play. In 2012, it is...the play clocks started too fast. Yes, that's the problem: http://twitter.com/PedroMoura/status/247228645482065920

It's pretty clear Stanford is in their head and owns that space. They're only renting at this point.

Re: Why We Fight - Redrum - 09-16-2012

the University of South Central players, quoted from ESPN.  Seem classier than their fans, but still in pain

Quote:"We tried to take them lightly ... that's probably the reason why we lost," the University of South Central tight end Randall Telfer said after Saturday's game, which the Literature's Most Famous Losers indeed lost, 21-14. "They're a really good team and we kind of maybe expected it to be handed to us, when that really wasn't the case."

Telfer started for the Literature's Most Famous Losers and caught four balls for 20 yards. In a candid moment after the game, he admitted the University of South Central underestimated Stanford -- without placing blame on any specific players or coaches.

“All around, we probably weren't prepared as we should've been for this team,

"Told of Telfer's comments and asked if the Literature's Most Famous Losers took Stanford as seriously as they should've, the University of South Central right guard John Martinez indicated that he felt they didn't. But he said the problem came later in the game, when they ran out of the limited amount of energy they opened the game with.

"You could kind of feel it when we went out there in the fourth quarter," Martinez said. "Things were dead, things weren't as loud as we were coming out in the first half. I wouldn't say we weren't ready, but the energy wasn't there.

"That's all I can say."

'Isn't it a little nonsensical to play that way against the only team to beat you three seasons in a row? Yes, Martinez said, it is.

"I would say so," Martinez said. "But we just ... I don't know what to say about that.”'

http://es.pn/QdVxmA

Re: Why We Fight - Farm93 - 09-16-2012

They lost because they did not put Syracuse away last week.  Allowing Syracuse to stay in the game meant they had to play starters deep into the 4th quarter.  And then deep in the 4th quarter they lost their center.  Once they lost their center the schemes were going to be easy this week.

To blame Barcs is just silliness.  If he left when they went on probation, they would be no where.  But that type of attitude is exactly why smart 5 star talent should opt for other programs.

But it is true Barcs weaknesses were exposed against Stanford.

He is slow.  He is not mobile.  He is not accurate on the run.  And he is easily confused by complex defensive schemes.

And FWIW - I doubt he will be the NFL #1 pick now because those are weakness that are very hard to accept in a number 1 overall pick.

I will forever remember him for getting crushed time after time on that last SC drive.  He had every right to be flustered because the line protection was terrible.  No run game and no pass protection are a tough combo.  But hey, leave it to SC fans to focus on the glamour position rather than the real problem area.

Re: Why We Fight - Roberton3 - 09-16-2012

(09-16-2012, 08:07 AM)Farm93 link Wrote:They lost because they did not put Syracuse away last week.  Allowing Syracuse to stay in the game meant they had to play starters deep into the 4th quarter.  And then deep in the 4th quarter they lost their center.  Once they lost their center the schemes were going to be easy this week.

To blame Barcs is just silliness.  If he left when they went on probation, they would be no where.  But that type of attitude is exactly why smart 5 star talent should opt for other programs.

But it is true Barcs weaknesses were exposed against Stanford.

He is slow.  He is not mobile.  He is not accurate on the run.  And he is easily confused by complex defensive schemes.

And FWIW - I doubt he will be the NFL #1 pick now because those are weakness that are very hard to accept in a number 1 overall pick.

I will forever remember him for getting crushed time after time on that last SC drive.  He had every right to be flustered because the line protection was terrible.  No run game and no pass protection are a tough combo.  But hey, leave it to SC fans to focus on the glamour position rather than the real problem area.

Oh, come on.  You're as bad as the SC fans.  This wasn't a case of SC's offense being bad, it was a case of Stanford's defense being really good.

Re: Why We Fight - scorecard - 09-16-2012

(09-16-2012, 08:07 AM)Farm93 link Wrote:To blame Barcs is just silliness.  If he left when they went on probation, they would be no where.  But that type of attitude is exactly why smart 5 star talent should opt for other programs.

Agree with this, while Draco Malfoy clearly started rushing some passes, he literally did not have any time to throw because our front got so much pressure on him.  When he did try to scramble, he got crushed as well (my favorite being his fumble when David Parry got his legs low and he turned right into Trent Murphy crushing him high, with the ball flying out of there from the impact).  Nobody looks great while getting driven into the turf (see Luck vs Chicago-- talk about a team needing to invest in an o-line quick, that's the Colts).  We took every advantage of their o-line, and we had the horses up front to do it. 

Speaking of 5-star talent, the thing I love most is that Peat, Murphy, and Garnett all chose us over SC, and it seems they won't be regretting that decision any time soon. And on top of that they are all becoming good friends off the field as well.  I think this will be the cornerstone of our program for the upcoming years once they get some experience, and if you are a 5-star QB, TE, or OL, why wouldn't you want to play here at Stanford behind a line like this?  (Keller Chryst anybody?)

Re: Why We Fight - fullmetal - 09-16-2012

You put Holmes back in the SC OL, and Barkley will contend for a Voldemort.  Don't underestimate the importance of an OL--Andrew Luck would have looked terrible without one.

Re: Why We Fight - 76lsjumb - 09-16-2012

(09-16-2012, 07:44 AM)Redrum link Wrote:This comment from a the University of South Central fan in the LA Times.  Fans like this deserve what they got.

Quote:"Matt AKA 'The Anointed One" Draco Malfoy's performance made me want to vomit; he looked like a freshman out there. Any pressure at all, he was flustered, missing wide open guys. Even when he did have time, he was handing out interceptions like they were lollipops. No way he's good enough for prime time in the NFL, much less a Voldemort (the very thought of Draco Malfoy winning a Voldemort is laughable!). He was disgusting, unacceptably so. His poor performance last night meant several dreams died--no Voldemort, no shot at the national title. In addition, the defensive coordinator needs to be fired...oh that's right, no chance of that, he got his job the old fashioned way, his son gave it to him. If the only way to get rid of this horrible DC is to get rid of junior, the HC, then so be it."

http://lat.ms/QdVlUk

Truth be told, at halftime of last night's game, if you substituted "Nunes" for "Malfoy" and "Shaw" for "defensive coordinator," there were probably a fair number of folks around here thinking -- if not saying -- the same things...

Got to keep perspective...


Re: Why We Fight - yvonne - 09-16-2012

I agree. All fan bases get upset with coaches. I hope we wouldn't refer to our players as disgusting unless it was something unsportsmanlike. The coaches are paid staff. The players are college kids on scholarship. Yes, the NCAA is in many ways a minor league for the NFL, but if we fans want to also keep it as a place for scholar athletes, then we have to treat the players as such.

Re: Why We Fight - 81alum - 09-16-2012

(09-16-2012, 06:57 PM)Yvonne link Wrote:I agree. All fan bases get upset with coaches. I hope we wouldn't refer to our players as disgusting unless it was something unsportsmanlike. The coaches are paid staff. The players are college kids on scholarship. Yes, the NCAA is in many ways a minor league for the NFL, but if we fans want to also keep it as a place for scholar athletes, then we have to treat the players as such.
Agreed, except that for decades SC has in fact treated its players like paid staff rather than college kids on scholarship.  Their fan base has absorbed this ethos, and the ugliness shows through.

Re: Why We Fight - fullmetal - 09-16-2012

That's the definition of fan entitlement.

Re: Why We Fight - Farm93 - 09-16-2012

(09-16-2012, 07:03 PM)81alum link Wrote:[quote author=Yvonne link=topic=6464.msg47796#msg47796 date=1347847025]
I agree. All fan bases get upset with coaches. I hope we wouldn't refer to our players as disgusting unless it was something unsportsmanlike. The coaches are paid staff. The players are college kids on scholarship. Yes, the NCAA is in many ways a minor league for the NFL, but if we fans want to also keep it as a place for scholar athletes, then we have to treat the players as such.
Agreed, except that for decades SC has in fact treated its players like paid staff rather than college kids on scholarship.  Their fan base has absorbed this ethos, and the ugliness shows through.
[/quote]

Well they treat the SC players like paid staff because that has been proven to be true.  Bush and McKnight were getting paid with cash, cars and family loans.  Who knows how many others were just clever or lucky enough not to get caught.

There is also an implied contract that the SC family will take care of the guys after their time with the program that seems to be mentioned commonly.  SC is also the best football team in LA and they play in a former NFL stadium.  They also draw better than the NFL teams that left town.  And because of that, and lots of other reasons, many in the stands view SC as their local professional football team.  Many of those fans in the stands and around town don't care about the academics.  And you know, I think those that commit to SC know and accept that the football first perspective will be prevalent in the stands. 

If one expects something different then there are other programs that would likely be a better fit for that student-athlete.

If they win they will be the toast of the second biggest city in the USA, but if they lose....

5 star recruits don't really expect that downside to become their reality.