Skeptics - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Skeptics (/thread-389.html)

---

Re: Skeptics - calumnus - 09-06-2010

Quote:Not everybody was overwhelmed by the Pac-10\'s opening-day performance. Note how we\'re barely mentioned at all.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703417104575473661530384560.html

At least you guys were mentioned. UW and UCLA? When were they last relevant?

---

Re: Skeptics - Scooter_Stepford - 09-06-2010

Quote:At least you guys were mentioned. UW and UCLA? When were they last relevant?

More recently than \'59?

---

Re: Skeptics - calumnus - 09-07-2010

Quote:

Quote:At least you guys were mentioned. UW and UCLA? When were they last relevant?

More recently than \'59?

Sure, we were Co-Champs with SC in 2006 and now with SC vacating their 2004 wins we were undefeated that year and either played in the National Championship Game or went to the Rose Bowl ;-)

You guys seem to be feeling pretty cocky this year. Easy win at UCLA this week? I hear they lost their entire starting offensive line and did not look good against K-State.

---