David Lombardi's Look Back at the UW Game - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: David Lombardi's Look Back at the UW Game (/thread-3944.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: David Lombardi's Look Back at the UW Game (/thread-3944.html)
David Lombardi's Look Back at the UW Game - stan01 - 09-30-2012
One of the best reporters covering Stanford, in my opinion:
http://stanford.scout.com/2/1226266.html
Re: David Lombardi's Look Back at the UW Game - 81alum - 09-30-2012
That was an interesting, if depressing, read. I had not noticed that we repeatedly threw at Desmond Trufont. Was that because he was on Montgomery? It shows the need to have a second WR target when the other side has their best player on your first WR.Â
Re: David Lombardi's Look Back at the UW Game - ChicagoCard - 09-30-2012
(09-30-2012, 07:45 AM)81alum link Wrote:That was an interesting, if depressing, read. I had not noticed that we repeatedly threw at Desmond Trufont. Was that because he was on Montgomery? It shows the need to have a second WR target when the other side has their best player on your first WR.
Great point. So never mind QB, who would be the likely candidates at receiver? I did notice Whitfield's number out there (1st half I think) and I've always wondered why one of the 6-3 / 6-4 guys hasn't broken in at all (Cajuste, Pratt, Crane although the latter is a freshman). But if speed rather than tight-end hybrids is the direction, then maybe Kelsey Young. At any rate Arizona seems to have a quick (3-3-5?) defense and Shaw and Hamilton, personnel changes or not, have to be up to the challenge of generating a breakthrough.