The CardBoard
Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 (/thread-4165.html)

Pages: 1 2

Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - TreeFitty - 11-03-2012

Josh Hogan?

Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - TreeFitty - 11-03-2012

Josh Hogan?

Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - kuz - 11-03-2012

(11-03-2012, 02:51 PM)garvin link Wrote:(My biggest question about the Buffs is how in the world they beat Washington State.)
The one arrow up for Colorado: their punting game. Their punter has a great leg and they always seemed to have good coverage downfield; Terrell rarely looked like breaking one loose (and he had plenty of opportunities).

Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - kuz - 11-03-2012

(11-03-2012, 02:51 PM)garvin link Wrote:(My biggest question about the Buffs is how in the world they beat Washington State.)
The one arrow up for Colorado: their punting game. Their punter has a great leg and they always seemed to have good coverage downfield; Terrell rarely looked like breaking one loose (and he had plenty of opportunities).

Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - Kathy - 11-03-2012

The Colorado punter probably has had more chances to ply his craft.


Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - Kathy - 11-03-2012

The Colorado punter probably has had more chances to ply his craft.


Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - Bruce Wang - 11-03-2012

Wait a minute.  I thought his name was Kyle.

Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - Bruce Wang - 11-03-2012

Wait a minute.  I thought his name was Kyle.

Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - Bruce Wang - 11-03-2012

What I liked was Hogan was able to spread the ball around.  Did not lock onto one option e.g. the Ertz across the middle special.

Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - Bruce Wang - 11-03-2012

What I liked was Hogan was able to spread the ball around.  Did not lock onto one option e.g. the Ertz across the middle special.

Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - stan01 - 11-03-2012

(11-03-2012, 06:36 PM)Publius link Wrote:What I liked was Hogan was able to spread the ball around.  Did not lock onto one option e.g. the Ertz across the middle special.

Nice to see a variety of receivers and some backups getting experience. 

Stanford Receiving
      REC YDS AVG TD LG
L. Toilolo 3 59 19.7 1 32
D. Terrell 3 42 14.0 0 17
Z. Ertz 6 41 6.8 1 13
S. Taylor 4 24 6.0 0 11
R. Hewitt 2 18 9.0 0 11
Patterson 2 18 9.0 0 20
M. Kasner 1 9 9.0 0 9
Cajuste 1 7 7.0 0 7
P. Skov 1 5 5.0 0 5
Montg. 1 5 5.0 0 5
J. Pratt 1 2 2.0 0 2
Team 25 230 9.2 2 32

I had to look up who "M. Kasner is."  A 6'4" freshman TE. 

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=323080038


Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - stan01 - 11-03-2012

(11-03-2012, 06:36 PM)Publius link Wrote:What I liked was Hogan was able to spread the ball around.  Did not lock onto one option e.g. the Ertz across the middle special.

Nice to see a variety of receivers and some backups getting experience. 

Stanford Receiving
      REC YDS AVG TD LG
L. Toilolo 3 59 19.7 1 32
D. Terrell 3 42 14.0 0 17
Z. Ertz 6 41 6.8 1 13
S. Taylor 4 24 6.0 0 11
R. Hewitt 2 18 9.0 0 11
Patterson 2 18 9.0 0 20
M. Kasner 1 9 9.0 0 9
Cajuste 1 7 7.0 0 7
P. Skov 1 5 5.0 0 5
Montg. 1 5 5.0 0 5
J. Pratt 1 2 2.0 0 2
Team 25 230 9.2 2 32

I had to look up who "M. Kasner is."  A 6'4" freshman TE. 

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=323080038


Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - JohnR34231 - 11-04-2012

I sure hope Montgomery gets over his case of the dropsies sooner rather than later.

We're going to need him to make some plays for us in the next three games.

Re: Final: Stanford 48, Colorado 0 - JohnR34231 - 11-04-2012

I sure hope Montgomery gets over his case of the dropsies sooner rather than later.

We're going to need him to make some plays for us in the next three games.

Big winner was David Shaw - Redrum - 11-04-2012

Accomplished lots of things this game.

1.  Finally played Nottingham and Nottingham made early season Shaw look wise and prescient.

2.  Held out Hogan until Colorado,  increasing the chances of success and...

3.  Let Josh Nunes participate in his own fall from starterdom without costing Stanford a victory.

4.  Really boosted team morale by letting all "the other guys" play.  Jackson Cummings probably phoned his mom before he took off his pads.  Betcha that was one happy planeload of players (minus one) flying back Saturday night.

5. Shut us up,  at least temporarily.

Not a bad afternoon's (afternunes?) work.

Big winner was David Shaw - Redrum - 11-04-2012

Accomplished lots of things this game.

1.  Finally played Nottingham and Nottingham made early season Shaw look wise and prescient.

2.  Held out Hogan until Colorado,  increasing the chances of success and...

3.  Let Josh Nunes participate in his own fall from starterdom without costing Stanford a victory.

4.  Really boosted team morale by letting all "the other guys" play.  Jackson Cummings probably phoned his mom before he took off his pads.  Betcha that was one happy planeload of players (minus one) flying back Saturday night.

5. Shut us up,  at least temporarily.

Not a bad afternoon's (afternunes?) work.

Re: Big winner was David Shaw - Gauss - 11-04-2012

(11-04-2012, 09:44 AM)Redrum link Wrote:Accomplished lots of things this game.

1.  Finally played Nottingham and Nottingham made early season Shaw look wise and prescient.
2.  Held out Hogan until Colorado,  increasing the chances of success and...
3.  Let Josh Nunes participate in his own fall from starterdom without costing Stanford a victory.
4.  Really boosted team morale by letting all "the other guys" play.  Jackson Cummings probably phoned his mom before he took off his pads.  Betcha that was one happy planeload of players (minus one) flying back Saturday night.
5. Shut us up,  at least temporarily.

Not a bad afternoon's (afternunes?) work.

I agree with all your points, but the trigger for my upvoting you was the final pun!
:D

I am very happy that the QB controversy and Shaw's criticisms have quieted down a bit. Personally, I've always felt we're pretty lucky about having Shaw, an alumnus with a serious and dignified demeanor, hard working, good recruiter, and good with the players. Plus, given the prices of coaches these days, pretty cheap!

That said, I'm impressed about how level the cardboard was during this controversy (which could reappear any time, for sure. Hogan seems to be a bit hesitant in the pocket, and the next 3 rivals might make him pay). In other boards the amount of vitriol would have been unbearable, and while there were a few posts here and there that, to me, seemed uncalled for, almost everybody participating in the debate was pretty awesome!

I'm really looking forward next Saturday. OSU looks pretty beatable, and I want to see Hogan against a good defense.


Re: Big winner was David Shaw - Gauss - 11-04-2012

(11-04-2012, 09:44 AM)Redrum link Wrote:Accomplished lots of things this game.

1.  Finally played Nottingham and Nottingham made early season Shaw look wise and prescient.
2.  Held out Hogan until Colorado,  increasing the chances of success and...
3.  Let Josh Nunes participate in his own fall from starterdom without costing Stanford a victory.
4.  Really boosted team morale by letting all "the other guys" play.  Jackson Cummings probably phoned his mom before he took off his pads.  Betcha that was one happy planeload of players (minus one) flying back Saturday night.
5. Shut us up,  at least temporarily.

Not a bad afternoon's (afternunes?) work.

I agree with all your points, but the trigger for my upvoting you was the final pun!
:D

I am very happy that the QB controversy and Shaw's criticisms have quieted down a bit. Personally, I've always felt we're pretty lucky about having Shaw, an alumnus with a serious and dignified demeanor, hard working, good recruiter, and good with the players. Plus, given the prices of coaches these days, pretty cheap!

That said, I'm impressed about how level the cardboard was during this controversy (which could reappear any time, for sure. Hogan seems to be a bit hesitant in the pocket, and the next 3 rivals might make him pay). In other boards the amount of vitriol would have been unbearable, and while there were a few posts here and there that, to me, seemed uncalled for, almost everybody participating in the debate was pretty awesome!

I'm really looking forward next Saturday. OSU looks pretty beatable, and I want to see Hogan against a good defense.


Re: Big winner was David Shaw - ChicagoCard - 11-04-2012

(11-04-2012, 10:16 AM)Gauss link Wrote:I'm really looking forward next Saturday. OSU looks pretty beatable, and I want to see Hogan against a good defense.

If a kickoff time is ever announced. Just checked the weather. Wow, 79 degrees today! But highs only in the 50s Friday and Saturday with 40% chance of rain Thursday and Friday. Maybe not a bad thing though, just as long as the field isn't awful.

Re: Big winner was David Shaw - ChicagoCard - 11-04-2012

(11-04-2012, 10:16 AM)Gauss link Wrote:I'm really looking forward next Saturday. OSU looks pretty beatable, and I want to see Hogan against a good defense.

If a kickoff time is ever announced. Just checked the weather. Wow, 79 degrees today! But highs only in the 50s Friday and Saturday with 40% chance of rain Thursday and Friday. Maybe not a bad thing though, just as long as the field isn't awful.