Literature's Most Famous Losers are one of ESPN's Draft Losers - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Literature's Most Famous Losers are one of ESPN's Draft Losers (/thread-5110.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Literature's Most Famous Losers are one of ESPN's Draft Losers (/thread-5110.html)
Literature's Most Famous Losers are one of ESPN's Draft Losers - Bruce Wang - 04-28-2013
http://espn.go.com/nfl/draft2013/story/_/id/9219238/2013-nfl-draft-draft-winners-losers
The best part is that the writer points our that UConn and Rutgers had better drafts.
Re: Literature's Most Famous Losers are one of ESPN's Draft Losers - washingtonismoney - 04-28-2013
By this definition we're even bigger losers -- only three players drafted. Using the "players drafted" metric only makes sense with a sufficient sample size, as you're otherwise going to get skewed by one big year.
Re: Literature's Most Famous Losers are one of ESPN's Draft Losers - fullmetal - 04-29-2013
No one gets trophies for drafting or recruiting. #turleytrained
Re: Literature's Most Famous Losers are one of ESPN's Draft Losers - FarmBoy - 04-29-2013
According to Scout.com:
Quote:Remember: Stanford led all colleges with nine rookies on NFL rosters at the end of 2012. The 2013 count likely won't be as high, but several surprises may still loom.
http://stanford.scout.com/2/1287832.html