2014 WRs or 2010 WRs? - Printable Version

2014 WRs or 2010 WRs? - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: 2014 WRs or 2010 WRs? (/thread-6367.html)

2014 WRs or 2010 WRs? - washingtonismoney - 12-15-2013

2010 wideouts -- with Whalen, Baldwin at his peak, and Owusu just off his -- were the previous high-water mark in the Harbaugh/Shaw era. But it seems to me the 2014 wideouts are (theoretically, assuming health and everyone returning) likely to be at worst equivalent. Thoughts?

Re: 2014 WRs or 2010 WRs? - Nan3cy - 12-15-2013

Can you really compare WRs to WRs without factoring in the tight ends? The way Stanford used its TEs when we had 'em, it seems as if the only way to look at them is as a single group. If you do that, 2010 wins by a bunch. (Though I agree that the WRs by themselves have been a pleasant surprise this year.)

Re: 2014 WRs or 2010 WRs? - terry - 12-15-2013

This year's wide receivers produced more yards and more TDs than the 2010 wide receivers. I think this year's group will only get better next year.

2013:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Rec.Â YdsÂ Â TDs

MontgomeryÂ Â Â Â 58Â 937Â Â 10
CajusteÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 27Â 591Â Â Â 5
RectorÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 12Â 387Â Â 3
WhitfieldÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â 16Â 170Â Â Â 1
PrattÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 12Â 148Â Â 0
OthersÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 12Â 136Â Â Â 1

TotalÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 137Â 2369Â Â 20
Per gameÂ Â Â Â 10.5Â Â 182
Yards/catchÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 17.3

2010:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Rec.Â YdsÂ Â TDs

BaldwinÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â 58Â 857Â Â 9
R. WhalenÂ Â Â Â Â 41Â 439Â Â 2
OwusuÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 25Â 396Â Â 3
G. WhalenÂ Â Â Â Â 17Â 249Â Â 1
OthersÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 8Â Â 85Â Â 0

TotalÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 149Â 2026Â 15
Per gameÂ Â Â Â 11.5Â Â 156
Yards/catchÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 13.6

[Stats are for 13 games in each year]