Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
washingtonismoney - 02-20-2014
Ah, Nick. So, a wide receiver coach leaves -- and owes a buyout to Alabama ... for the grand sum of $57,000. Here's what happens next:
Quote:What's interesting here is that Nick Saban could have opted to waive the buyout, as happens in on occasion in these cases, but chose not to. Fifty-seven thousand dollars is a lot of money, clearly, but that chunk of change will obviously affect Groh much more than Alabama or the Chicago Bears. Groh's contract stated he had 14 days to pay the damages and now, a year later, Alabama is taking him to court.
http://footballscoop.com/news/12635-memo-to-coaches-know-what-s-in-your-contract
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
scorecard - 02-21-2014
So, which couch did Saban look under to find that human stain called Lane Kiffin? And is it too late to convince our Michigan State friends to burn said couch?
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
BostonCard - 02-23-2014
(02-20-2014, 10:11 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Ah, Nick. So, a wide receiver coach leaves -- and owes a buyout to Alabama ... for the grand sum of $57,000. Here's what happens next:
Quote:What's interesting here is that Nick Saban could have opted to waive the buyout, as happens in on occasion in these cases, but chose not to. Fifty-seven thousand dollars is a lot of money, clearly, but that chunk of change will obviously affect Groh much more than Alabama or the Chicago 59ers. Groh's contract stated he had 14 days to pay the damages and now, a year later, Alabama is taking him to court.
http://footballscoop.com/news/12635-memo-to-coaches-know-what-s-in-your-contract
Looks like the site's autocorrect strikes again. It is unfortunate that the pro football team in Chicago is also named after the mammals of the family Ursidae. After all, the Chicago team won Super Bowl XX in 1985.
BC
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
washingtonismoney - 02-24-2014
I think there's a perfectly good logical distinction to be made (though perhaps board software can't pick it up).
Bearz of the Golden variety are extinct (look it up!). Naming your team after them just shows your utter 59erness. Of course having an extinct animal as your mascot will doom you to futility.
Other b.ears are proud, intelligent animals.
Wingin' the Bears' mascot explanation -
Mick - 02-24-2014
The N.L. Chicago baseball team was originally the White Stockings in 1876, and were also known as the Colts (1890-1897) and Orphans (1898-1902) before new manager Frank Selee went on a youth kick, leading the local paper to referring to them as the "Cubs."Â Lots of NFL teams adopted the baseball name equivalents (NY Giants football), so "Bears" from "Cubs" made sense.
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
Kathy - 02-24-2014
Aah ... but the Chicago Cubs are the 59ers of Major League Baseball.
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
washingtonismoney - 02-24-2014
(02-24-2014, 09:30 AM)garvin link Wrote:I'm starting a White House petition to have your status changed from "Supreme Court Justice: to "Squirmy Apologist."
Well, aside from that, I've always preferred the "tech mogul" title to "Supreme Court Justice."
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
CowboyIndian - 02-24-2014
(02-24-2014, 09:08 AM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Bearz of the Golden variety are extinct (look it up!).
Not sure where this is to be looked up but grizzlies (which come in lots of shades....from cinnamon to silvertip to red to "golden") are extinct in California but very much extant in Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Alaska and a couple of Canadian provinces.
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
stupac2 - 02-24-2014
(02-24-2014, 01:54 PM)CowboyIndian link Wrote:[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=9578.msg84328#msg84328 date=1393258088]
Bearz of the Golden variety are extinct (look it up!).
Not sure where this is to be looked up but grizzlies (which come in lots of shades....from cinnamon to silvertip to red to "golden") are extinct in California but very much extant in Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Alaska and a couple of Canadian provinces.
[/quote]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_golden_bear
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
CowboyIndian - 02-24-2014
From the Wikipedia page quoted: "Genetically, North American grizzlies are closely related."
I guess my contention is that "closely related" means "as to be indistinguishable". Oh well.
Ursus horribilis -
Brannerite - 02-24-2014
The previous taxonomy of the California grizzly is rather befitting. Per the Wiki:
Quote:Properly, all subspecies in North America are known as Grizzlies and until recently, the California Grizzly was classified Ursus horribilis.
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
stupac2 - 02-24-2014
(02-24-2014, 03:49 PM)CowboyIndian link Wrote:From the Wikipedia page quoted: "Genetically, North American grizzlies are closely related."
I guess my contention is that "closely related" means "as to be indistinguishable". Oh well.
So you want it to read "Genetically, North American grizzlies are as to be indistinguishable"?
(Sorry, given that it's you, couldn't help myself.)
I personally don't really care about this but I didn't know anything about the "golden be
ar" so I wanted to look it up. I think at some point species/subspecies classification gets pretty hairy but that's fairly far outside of my areas of expertise.
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
97fan - 02-24-2014
A friend of mine did an interesting radio story a little while back about Monarch, the grizzly that's memorialized on the California state flag. The story involves William Randolph Hearst, a San Francisco newspaper reporter who was sent bear-hunting in Ventura County, and Golden Gate Park.
http://www.scpr.org/programs/take-two/2012/10/24/28981/monarch-the-sad-amazing-story-of-the-bear-on-calif/
These events took place in roughly the same era that UC-Berkeley adopted its nickname; I'm not sure if there's a connection, though.
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
yvonne - 02-24-2014
(02-24-2014, 04:29 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=CowboyIndian link=topic=9578.msg84392#msg84392 date=1393282196]
From the Wikipedia page quoted: "Genetically, North American grizzlies are closely related."
I guess my contention is that "closely related" means "as to be indistinguishable". Oh well.
So you want it to read "Genetically, North American grizzlies are as to be indistinguishable"?
(Sorry, given that it's you, couldn't help myself.)
I personally don't really care about this but I didn't know anything about the "golden bear" so I wanted to look it up.
[/quote]
Why would you want to do that?
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
CowboyIndian - 02-24-2014
(02-24-2014, 04:29 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:So you want it to read "Genetically, North American grizzlies are as to be indistinguishable"?
Had that coming ;D
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
Robbie - 02-25-2014
(02-24-2014, 04:29 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:I personally don't really care about this but I didn't know anything about the "golden bear" so I wanted to look it up.
Here's what I learned.
The golden be
ar is losing all his hair.
The golden be
ar has got the gout.
The golden be
ar doesn't know what it's all about.
The golden be
ar has eyes made of glass
The golden be
ar is losing all his class.
Re: Nick Saban: Looking Under All The Couches For Small Change -
Bruce Wang - 02-25-2014
According to its wikipedia entry:
"In 1924, a grizzly known to roam an area of the southern Sierras was spotted for the last time, and thereafter, grizzlies were never seen again in California."
Since this is about the last time they won the Rose Bowl, sounds like they picked the right mascot.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_golden_bear