Yards Rushing: BC 452 U$C 20 - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Yards Rushing: BC 452 U$C 20 (/thread-7780.html)

---

Yards Rushing: BC 452 U$C 20 - OutsiderFan - 09-13-2014

Yes, and I thought Stanford's 250-20 ground advantage in 2013 was crazy.  This, and the fact Army gained 200 on the ground today, demonstrates clearly how much more important it is to pass the ball effectively than run it well.

Army had 9 yards passing.  And U$C was within an onside kick recovery of possibly winning the game being out gained on the ground by 20x.

I know I said I would root for U$C, but I just couldn't do it; was rooting like hell for BC tonight. 

---

Re: Yards Rushing: BC 452 U$C 20 - stupac2 - 09-13-2014

(09-13-2014, 09:43 PM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:I know I said I would root for U$C, but I just couldn't do it; was rooting like hell for BC tonight.

As were all right-thinking people.

---

Re: Yards Rushing: BC 452 U$C 20 - Mick - 09-13-2014

(09-13-2014, 09:43 PM)OutsiderFan link Wrote:Yes, and I thought Stanford's 250-20 ground advantage in 2013 was crazy.  This, and the fact Army gained 200 on the ground today, demonstrates clearly how much more important it is to pass the ball effectively than run it well.

Army had 9 yards passing.  And U$C was within an onside kick recovery of possibly winning the game being out gained on the ground by 20x.

I know I said I would root for U$C, but I just couldn't do it; was rooting like hell for BC tonight.

I knew you were a closet Jesuit....

---

Re: Yards Rushing: BC 452 U$C 20 - JohnR34231 - 09-14-2014

If ISIS had a football team and was playing U$C I'd probably root for the Condoms. Otherwise......

---