The CardBoard
history of recruiting question - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: history of recruiting question (/thread-9113.html)

Pages: 1 2

history of recruiting question - TrumpCard - 04-13-2015

Costello, Robinson, and Butler are California natives with 4+ GPAs.  They are the quintessential Stanford men.  I could try to put together an argument that it wasn't such an achievement to land Costello and Robinson because kids like them are destined to come to Stanford.  But it's hard to remember many examples of elite California recruits with 4+ GPAs as a basis for comparison.  I'm sure there were other years with 1 (Bobby Okereke, Frank Buncom), but I certainly don't remember a year with 3.  Who are the ones who came to Stanford and who are the ones who went elsewhere?

Re: history of recruiting question - slide - 04-14-2015

off the top of my head, Josh Rosen would lead the way.  Rosen was #1 recruit in CA last year with a reported 4.2 gpa (UCLA).  Justice Shelton-Mosley (Harvard) would be another, Matt Katnik with a 4.3 (now at USC).  Equanamious St. Brown would be in that academic picture too (Notre Dame)

Re: history of recruiting question - BobK - 04-14-2015

Watched Shelton-Mosley play basetball, he is tiny.  Super athlete but 5-8 or so and slim.

Ah Katnik, 71 foot shot put this past weekend.



Re: history of recruiting question - yvonne - 04-14-2015

Now, that's impressive.

Re: history of recruiting question - TrumpCard - 04-14-2015

Thanks for the responses.  I hadn't considered other sports, but it makes sense to do that.

In football, St. Brown does seem like a good counter-example to the hypothesis.  So, kudos to the staff for landing some great recruits in this class.

Re: history of recruiting question - BobK - 04-14-2015

St Brown didn't take AP classes.   

Re: history of recruiting question - BostonCard - 04-14-2015

And Rosen was never offered by us, for reasons that had nothing to do with his admissibility.

BC

Re: history of recruiting question - rudruff - 04-14-2015

That is part of the confusion I usually see at this point in each recruiting class.

I think a lot of recruits claim interest in Stanford because they get approving nods and people decide they are good students.

Applying requires taking APs, multiple attempts at standardized tests, sweating out your grades, dealing with the application, etc. That is a lot harder than saying you want to go to an academic school and that your parents put academics first.

I find myself looking for a few key phrases that show the recruit has actually talked to someone on the staff about trying to get into school: early enrollment(no), taking APs(yes), anything about the application(yes).

This year looks very promising so far.





Re: history of recruiting question - TrumpCard - 04-14-2015

St. Brown had the grades through junior year.  If he actually wanted to attend Stanford, all he had to do was take some APs.  He decided not to do that, which means he was planning to go elsewhere.  Initially that was U$C or UCLA, but that changed to USB when the first two choices didn't work out.  But the main point (for purposes of my hypothesis, which I didn't necessarily believe from the start) is that you can't assume an elite California recruit with a 4+ GPA in junior year is going to pick Stanford.

I agree that Rosen is not a counter example to my hypothesis in that Rosen expressed a strong interest in attending Stanford until Shaw decided not to offer.

Re: history of recruiting question - BostonCard - 04-14-2015

By the way, it will be interesting to see how Rosen's career develops (especially in comparison to Chryst and Costello).  Obviously a lot of stuff can happen that could not be anticipated (injuries for example), but we'll get to see how good Shaw's instincts are.

BC

Re: history of recruiting question - CTcard - 04-14-2015

(04-14-2015, 10:41 AM)Boston Card link Wrote:  but we'll get to see how good Shaw's instincts are.

Except we won't because we'll never really know why Shaw chose otherwise.

If Shaw decided Rosen was never going to be a good enough quarterback inherently, then we're likely to get an answer. If Shaw decided there was something about Stanford and Rosen that didn't fit well together ... well we'll not be directly testing that hypothesis.

And if you are in a position to get a straight answer on that from Shaw, you probably shouldn't be posting it on a message board.

Re: history of recruiting question - BostonCard - 04-14-2015

It's been reported here and elsewhere that the concern was his attitude.  So you could interpret that two ways.  One is that a bad attitude and lack of leadership would be poisonous no matter where he went.  The other is that it would be a particular liability at Stanford, where the players have to buy into the "blue collar" mentality.

BC

Re: history of recruiting question - CTcard - 04-14-2015

(04-14-2015, 03:06 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:It's been reported here and elsewhere that the concern was his attitude. 

Yes. That has been reported ...

Re: history of recruiting question - needle - 04-14-2015

Quote: Ah Katnik, 71 foot shot put this past weekend.

Is the schoolboy shot 12 pounds?



Re: history of recruiting question - BobK - 04-14-2015

Yes 12 lb for HS. 

Re: history of recruiting question - Hank 91 - 04-14-2015

(04-14-2015, 03:08 PM)CTcard link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=12027.msg116721#msg116721 date=1429049194]
It's been reported here and elsewhere that the concern was his attitude. 

Yes. That has been reported ...
[/quote]

He didn't do himself any favors with his appearance on ESPN's Elite 11 special, you'll recall. Trent Dilfer and the other coaches openly questioned whether or not he would be able to learn a college system, not because he wasn't smart enough, but because he would think he knew better than the coaches. That scene explained everything to me.

Re: history of recruiting question - Hank 91 - 04-14-2015

One note about high school GPAs. This will come as no surprise, but there is often a wide disparity in the meaning of an A at one school as compared to another, even another school in the same school district. So a recruit could have a 4.0, but that only tells you part of the story. It isn't at all inconceivable that a 4.0 student could look at the rigors of Stanford -- which begin with AP courses as a junior and senior in high school -- and choose the easier path at another school. To be honest, I can't fault those who make that choice. Stanford isn't for everyone. Thankfully.

Re: history of recruiting question - Hulk01 - 04-15-2015

It didn't help Rosen that he's very, very slow. 

Re: history of recruiting question - JohnR34231 - 04-15-2015

Rosen is reportedly the standout among UCLA QB hopefuls during Bruin spring practices so far. We may get to see how effective he is at the college level sooner rather than later.

Re: history of recruiting question - Rally - 04-15-2015

Bruce Feldman is saying, in reaction to Winston's Wonderlic score, that Winston was accepted at Stanford.  True, false, or rumor?