Wilner made a Pac 12 2016 standings projection about a week back.
He picks UW to win the north. I stated previously they would be the trendy choice as the sleeper team to win the north - so trendy there won't be anything sleeper about it.
North: UW - Stanford - Oregon - WSU - c.a.l. - OSU
South: $C - UCLA - Utah - Arizona - ASU - Colorado
Says it's a tight group of four in the north, three in the south.
I'm suspicious of UW, WSU, and Utah; but not necessarily so far as to change their rank order other than UW.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegespor...ions-2016/
He also does a projection of next year's All Pac-12 team, which includes three four Stanford players: McCaffrey, Caspers, Thomas, and Schultz.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegespor...more-42000
EDITED to fix link, add Schultz (thanks BC), but leaving the Canadianism (those leak through sometimes, but hey they're part of my heritage).
He picks UW to win the north. I stated previously they would be the trendy choice as the sleeper team to win the north - so trendy there won't be anything sleeper about it.
North: UW - Stanford - Oregon - WSU - c.a.l. - OSU
South: $C - UCLA - Utah - Arizona - ASU - Colorado
Says it's a tight group of four in the north, three in the south.
I'm suspicious of UW, WSU, and Utah; but not necessarily so far as to change their rank order other than UW.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegespor...ions-2016/
He also does a projection of next year's All Pac-12 team, which includes three four Stanford players: McCaffrey, Caspers, Thomas, and Schultz.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegespor...more-42000
EDITED to fix link, add Schultz (thanks BC), but leaving the Canadianism (those leak through sometimes, but hey they're part of my heritage).

