09-24-2016, 08:12 PM
Shades of Northwestern.
BC
BC
Stanford at UCLA Game Thread
09-24-2016, 08:12 PM
Can some please please explain why the HELL Shaw let time run off before he called the timeout?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!
>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
Someone has to explain this to me. What possible reason could there be?
>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
Someone has to explain this to me. What possible reason could there be?
Can some please please explain why the HELL Shaw let time run off before he called the timeout?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!
>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
Someone has to explain this to me. What possible reason could there be?
>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
Someone has to explain this to me. What possible reason could there be?
09-24-2016, 08:13 PM
(09-24-2016, 08:11 PM)ThePOC link Wrote:That may have been the backbreaker.4th and 1 - punt - that was the ball game! And the effects of that may last beyond just this game.
(09-24-2016, 08:11 PM)ThePOC link Wrote:That may have been the backbreaker.4th and 1 - punt - that was the ball game! And the effects of that may last beyond just this game.
09-24-2016, 08:13 PM
(09-24-2016, 08:12 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Ok. Now that punt looks stupid.
It looked stupid at the time, too.
(09-24-2016, 08:12 PM)jacketree link Wrote:Ok. Now that punt looks stupid.
It looked stupid at the time, too.
09-24-2016, 08:13 PM
I was hoping, at the very least, that Shaw used Bailey's athleticism to do a fake punt. But, no......
All models are wrong; some models are useful......
George Box
That decision to punt was basically like a turnover. Maddening.
Don't need the timeouts anyway, 2:00 is plenty of time.
09-24-2016, 08:15 PM
I can't believe we punted the ball.
The game is shades of Northwestern.
We better find a passing attack before we go up to Seattle next week.
The game is shades of Northwestern.
We better find a passing attack before we go up to Seattle next week.
I can't believe we punted the ball.
The game is shades of Northwestern.
We better find a passing attack before we go up to Seattle next week.
The game is shades of Northwestern.
We better find a passing attack before we go up to Seattle next week.
09-24-2016, 08:15 PM
Who woulda thunk that "opposing blogger" would come closest to the final score? Sheesh.
Pax et Bonum
Who woulda thunk that "opposing blogger" would come closest to the final score? Sheesh.
Pax et Bonum
09-24-2016, 08:15 PM
Shaw just burns 20 seconds for no good reason.
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
09-24-2016, 08:15 PM
I'm confused... shouldn't the clock have stopped since the UCLA receiver went out of bounds?
I'm confused... shouldn't the clock have stopped since the UCLA receiver went out of bounds?
09-24-2016, 08:16 PM
I'm...not sure I have faith we can run a 2 minute drive with no TOs...
Flag is a good start.
Flag is a good start.
I'm...not sure I have faith we can run a 2 minute drive with no TOs...
Flag is a good start.
Flag is a good start.
09-24-2016, 08:16 PM
(09-24-2016, 08:15 PM)JPRI link Wrote:I can't believe we punted the ball.
The game is shades of Northwestern.
We better find a passing attack before we go up to Seattle next week.
I was thinking the same thing about the NW game.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
(09-24-2016, 08:15 PM)JPRI link Wrote:I can't believe we punted the ball.
The game is shades of Northwestern.
We better find a passing attack before we go up to Seattle next week.
I was thinking the same thing about the NW game.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-24-2016, 08:16 PM
Bust one for 70 out of Ogre?
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »