09-30-2016, 06:55 PM
A goal line stand here is imperative.
Stanford vs. Washington Game Thread
09-30-2016, 06:55 PM
It may be time to just flush this game down the toilet and regroup for WSU.
BC
BC
It may be time to just flush this game down the toilet and regroup for WSU.
BC
BC
09-30-2016, 06:55 PM
It may be time to just flush this game down the toilet and regroup for WSU.
BC
BC
It may be time to just flush this game down the toilet and regroup for WSU.
BC
BC
09-30-2016, 06:55 PM
It may be time to just flush this game down the toilet and regroup for WSU.
BC
BC
It may be time to just flush this game down the toilet and regroup for WSU.
BC
BC
09-30-2016, 06:56 PM
Or holding...
UW has tossed 5 points to the curb so far.
UW has tossed 5 points to the curb so far.
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
09-30-2016, 06:56 PM
Or holding...
UW has tossed 5 points to the curb so far.
UW has tossed 5 points to the curb so far.
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
09-30-2016, 06:56 PM
Or holding...
UW has tossed 5 points to the curb so far.
UW has tossed 5 points to the curb so far.
Yeah, I just stare at my desk, but it looks like I'm working .I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work. Peter Gibbons
09-30-2016, 06:57 PM
(09-30-2016, 06:55 PM)Yvonne link Wrote:Maybe this isn't just UW. Maybe this year is 2014. We did lose three guys up front and a very experienced and accomplished QB.Yeah, it is definitely feeling like 2014...
Pax et Bonum
(09-30-2016, 06:55 PM)Yvonne link Wrote:Maybe this isn't just UW. Maybe this year is 2014. We did lose three guys up front and a very experienced and accomplished QB.Yeah, it is definitely feeling like 2014...
Pax et Bonum
09-30-2016, 06:57 PM
(09-30-2016, 06:55 PM)Yvonne link Wrote:Maybe this isn't just UW. Maybe this year is 2014. We did lose three guys up front and a very experienced and accomplished QB.Yeah, it is definitely feeling like 2014...
Pax et Bonum
(09-30-2016, 06:55 PM)Yvonne link Wrote:Maybe this isn't just UW. Maybe this year is 2014. We did lose three guys up front and a very experienced and accomplished QB.Yeah, it is definitely feeling like 2014...
Pax et Bonum
09-30-2016, 06:57 PM
(09-30-2016, 06:55 PM)Yvonne link Wrote:Maybe this isn't just UW. Maybe this year is 2014. We did lose three guys up front and a very experienced and accomplished QB.Yeah, it is definitely feeling like 2014...
Pax et Bonum
(09-30-2016, 06:55 PM)Yvonne link Wrote:Maybe this isn't just UW. Maybe this year is 2014. We did lose three guys up front and a very experienced and accomplished QB.Yeah, it is definitely feeling like 2014...
Pax et Bonum
09-30-2016, 06:57 PM
He was wide open. Thank goodness he dropped it. We were lucky to wind up giving up only 3.
So far: Stanford: 3 possessions, 0 points
UW: 3 possessions, 20 points
I can't imagine what the per-play stats are...
BC
So far: Stanford: 3 possessions, 0 points
UW: 3 possessions, 20 points
I can't imagine what the per-play stats are...
BC
He was wide open. Thank goodness he dropped it. We were lucky to wind up giving up only 3.
So far: Stanford: 3 possessions, 0 points
UW: 3 possessions, 20 points
I can't imagine what the per-play stats are...
BC
So far: Stanford: 3 possessions, 0 points
UW: 3 possessions, 20 points
I can't imagine what the per-play stats are...
BC
09-30-2016, 06:57 PM
He was wide open. Thank goodness he dropped it. We were lucky to wind up giving up only 3.
So far: Stanford: 3 possessions, 0 points
UW: 3 possessions, 20 points
I can't imagine what the per-play stats are...
BC
So far: Stanford: 3 possessions, 0 points
UW: 3 possessions, 20 points
I can't imagine what the per-play stats are...
BC
He was wide open. Thank goodness he dropped it. We were lucky to wind up giving up only 3.
So far: Stanford: 3 possessions, 0 points
UW: 3 possessions, 20 points
I can't imagine what the per-play stats are...
BC
So far: Stanford: 3 possessions, 0 points
UW: 3 possessions, 20 points
I can't imagine what the per-play stats are...
BC
09-30-2016, 06:57 PM
He was wide open. Thank goodness he dropped it. We were lucky to wind up giving up only 3.
So far: Stanford: 3 possessions, 0 points
UW: 3 possessions, 20 points
I can't imagine what the per-play stats are...
BC
So far: Stanford: 3 possessions, 0 points
UW: 3 possessions, 20 points
I can't imagine what the per-play stats are...
BC
He was wide open. Thank goodness he dropped it. We were lucky to wind up giving up only 3.
So far: Stanford: 3 possessions, 0 points
UW: 3 possessions, 20 points
I can't imagine what the per-play stats are...
BC
So far: Stanford: 3 possessions, 0 points
UW: 3 possessions, 20 points
I can't imagine what the per-play stats are...
BC
09-30-2016, 06:58 PM
Was Burns hurt? Or, did Shawgren pull him for poor performance?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-30-2016, 06:58 PM
Was Burns hurt? Or, did Shawgren pull him for poor performance?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »