09-16-2017, 09:53 PM
Burns appears to come in strictly for the purpose of sealing the backside. Cute, I guess, but gimmicky.
Stanford at SDSU Game Thread
Burns appears to come in strictly for the purpose of sealing the backside. Cute, I guess, but gimmicky.
09-16-2017, 09:53 PM
Love might've scored if Chryst didn't run in front of him and slow him down a step.
09-16-2017, 09:54 PM
Maybe we should have had Burns in there. Ugh, we are short.
Why is Shaw kicking the FG?
BC
Why is Shaw kicking the FG?
BC
Maybe we should have had Burns in there. Ugh, we are short.
Why is Shaw kicking the FG?
BC
Why is Shaw kicking the FG?
BC
(09-16-2017, 09:54 PM)dabigv link Wrote:Hate this.
Second that.
09-16-2017, 09:55 PM
(09-16-2017, 09:54 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Maybe we should have had Burns in there. Ugh, we are short.
Why is Shaw kicking the FG?
BC
![[Image: tumblr_inline_nl601sUVE91rd7tbz.gif]](https://68.media.tumblr.com/4e2d1669e26200698f007f10b78bb9e0/tumblr_inline_nl601sUVE91rd7tbz.gif)
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-16-2017, 09:57 PM
(09-16-2017, 09:54 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Maybe we should have had Burns in there. Ugh, we are short.
Why is Shaw kicking the FG?
BC
Because he knows a lot more about coaching and winning football games than any of us here. Don't question!
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
(09-16-2017, 09:54 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Maybe we should have had Burns in there. Ugh, we are short.
Why is Shaw kicking the FG?
BC
Because he knows a lot more about coaching and winning football games than any of us here. Don't question!
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
09-16-2017, 09:57 PM
(09-16-2017, 09:53 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=North Woods link=topic=17411.msg200931#msg200931 date=1505623721]
Apart from the TD Love has 5 yards on 5 carries. Not getting much.
Where are our tight ends?
We need more posts like this. No sooner do you post it than Love goes for 47 yards, and then we throw it to Schultz.
BC
[/quote]
Happy to help any way I can.
(09-16-2017, 09:53 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=North Woods link=topic=17411.msg200931#msg200931 date=1505623721]
Apart from the TD Love has 5 yards on 5 carries. Not getting much.
Where are our tight ends?
We need more posts like this. No sooner do you post it than Love goes for 47 yards, and then we throw it to Schultz.
BC
[/quote]
Happy to help any way I can.
09-16-2017, 09:58 PM
(09-16-2017, 09:54 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Maybe we should have had Burns in there. Ugh, we are short.
Why is Shaw kicking the FG?
BC
I mean, the way this game is going we probably would've fumbled for a TD by them if we went for it. The defense is playing pretty well, let's see if they can get a turnover.
(09-16-2017, 09:54 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:Maybe we should have had Burns in there. Ugh, we are short.
Why is Shaw kicking the FG?
BC
I mean, the way this game is going we probably would've fumbled for a TD by them if we went for it. The defense is playing pretty well, let's see if they can get a turnover.
09-16-2017, 09:58 PM
Raise your hand if you thought Love would have more rushing yards than Penny AND that Chapman would have more passing yards than Chryst.
BC
BC
Raise your hand if you thought Love would have more rushing yards than Penny AND that Chapman would have more passing yards than Chryst.
BC
BC
09-16-2017, 10:00 PM
I think Shaw is channeling Paul Wiggin, alas.......
All models are wrong; some models are useful......
George Box
09-16-2017, 10:00 PM
That's how little trust Shaw has in our OL. Not going for it on 4th and inches.
That's how little trust Shaw has in our OL. Not going for it on 4th and inches.
09-16-2017, 10:00 PM
(09-16-2017, 09:57 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17411.msg200941#msg200941 date=1505624089]
Maybe we should have had Burns in there. Ugh, we are short.
Why is Shaw kicking the FG?
BC
Because he knows a lot more about coaching and winning football games than any of us here. Don't question!
Wrong.
[/quote]
(09-16-2017, 09:57 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17411.msg200941#msg200941 date=1505624089]
Maybe we should have had Burns in there. Ugh, we are short.
Why is Shaw kicking the FG?
BC
Because he knows a lot more about coaching and winning football games than any of us here. Don't question!
Wrong.
[/quote]
09-16-2017, 10:04 PM
Okay. We've got the ball. Let's do this.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-16-2017, 10:08 PM
Did I see the graphic correctly? Stanford has 5.1 ypp? Must be skewed by the two big Love runs.
BC
BC
Did I see the graphic correctly? Stanford has 5.1 ypp? Must be skewed by the two big Love runs.
BC
BC
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »