(12-07-2019, 03:45 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Sure why not. Given that I had given up on Stratford seeing the field in a Stanford uniform, if he can contribute on D, that would be a positive.
On TE, I suppose a lot depends on what happens with Párkinson next year. If he’s back, agree on moving Fisk to defense. Cotton made the move. It wasn’t an overwhelming success, but he added depth at a position of need. But if Párkinson leaves, it’s not like we have a ton of depth at TE; Harrington, Archer and the frosh coming in, none of them proven.
BC
Not taking one in '18 hurts. You can kind of argue that whole class will affect us for multiple years too:
- No TE
- Only 1 OL who has been hurt his entire career here
- Only 1 RB (despite Heimuli-Lund's departure and Wedington moving to WR) who probably won't contribute...especially if we land EJ Smith
- Only 3 DBs (despite being very thin there and only taking 2 in the previous class), 2 of whom probably won't contribute due to frequent injury (Bonner) or being passed up by true frosh walk-ons on STs (Logan)
- Only 1 DL (assuming Fox stays at OLB), who didn't RS so only has 2 eligible years left. Only taking 1 again in '19 will prove to be the real killer here. Needed more in at least one of those two classes, if not both.
- A QB who we offered too early (at age 15!!!) who didn't develop much in HS...we saw what happened when he played. Rumor has it he's the reason we're waiting so long to offer QBs now, including '21 (but there is a short list and I think/hope an offer is coming soon after HS playoffs finish).
- A scholarship FB not even in the same universe as previous wrecking balls Daniel Marx and Ryan Hewitt. It's one thing to get a scholarship FB who's clearly a beast, but it's another to...uh...not. Two years in a row. I think staff has learned.
Having a couple holes/whiffs in a large class is expected and not usually a big deal. But when it's over half the class of just 14 guys and you don't have the depth to support it? Massive yikes.