12-04-2022, 03:10 PM
WBB: Stanford 84 -- Gonzaga 63
12-04-2022, 03:35 PM
(12-04-2022, 02:48 PM)magnus Wrote: Anyone record or have a link to the halftime segment on the Pac12 Network following Brink and Jones around on I think media day? It was a fun video for the part i caught.
That segment is on the Stanford Athletics YouTube channel. See https://youtu.be/blUFfqXO2Fg
(12-04-2022, 02:48 PM)magnus Wrote: Anyone record or have a link to the halftime segment on the Pac12 Network following Brink and Jones around on I think media day? It was a fun video for the part i caught.
That segment is on the Stanford Athletics YouTube channel. See https://youtu.be/blUFfqXO2Fg
12-04-2022, 04:12 PM
(12-04-2022, 03:35 PM)CompSci87 Wrote:(12-04-2022, 02:48 PM)magnus Wrote: Anyone record or have a link to the halftime segment on the Pac12 Network following Brink and Jones around on I think media day? It was a fun video for the part i caught.
That segment is on the Stanford Athletics YouTube channel. See https://youtu.be/blUFfqXO2Fg
Thank you!
(12-04-2022, 03:35 PM)CompSci87 Wrote:(12-04-2022, 02:48 PM)magnus Wrote: Anyone record or have a link to the halftime segment on the Pac12 Network following Brink and Jones around on I think media day? It was a fun video for the part i caught.
That segment is on the Stanford Athletics YouTube channel. See https://youtu.be/blUFfqXO2Fg
Thank you!
12-04-2022, 04:40 PM
Chalk Talk and Behind the Bench
For those of you who could not attend the before-and-after meetings, they were very informative. I would say that due to astute questions that were asked of Katy and Tara, we got some deep insight into the new offense. In fact, I told Katy that it was the best chalk talk I have attended, since it actually helped fans understand basketball strategy.
The decision was made to leave the Princeton and go to the "flow offense." The reason for the change is that the Princeton is intricate and takes a lot of time to learn, but our perimeter players were young and inexperienced. We needed an offense that was simpler and could be run right away. This in my view is probably the reason that we can use a freshman point guard.
What is the flow offense? I am going to spend some time watching videos and studying this, but as Katy described it, it usually uses two bigs. We try to work it inside, and if that is not feasible, the bigs begin to set screens for our perimeter players. It "flows" from a screen on one side to a screen on the other, etc. until someone gets open.
Katy also explained how our offense and the plays get called. The main call is the formation our players are going to take up on offense. It could be "2 in 3 out," "1 in 4 out," or even "5 out." There are individual plays that can be called from the formations, and Tara communicates those plays to the point guard. As Katy said, "Tara will call plays all game long." However, most of the time the point guard is looking for plays at the start of set, and there is a kind of default about looking inside and then setting up the mirror image flow. For example, when it became clear that Gonzaga was zoning us and shutting down entrance passes, we went to a "1 in 4 out" to maximize our shooters on the perimeter, and that was the dominant formation we saw today. However, the "2 in 3 out" is what we usually want to run, since our greatest strength is in posts.
Other tidbits from the chalk talk, Katy was effusive in her praise of Lepolo, "she has eyes in the back of her head." "If anyone is open on the court she will find them." When someone asked about the occasions when Brink got to the low post, turned, had her hands up and screamed for the ball--but Lepolo did not get her the ball--Katy said "it could have been a decoy, or possibly just inexperience."
For those of you who could not attend the before-and-after meetings, they were very informative. I would say that due to astute questions that were asked of Katy and Tara, we got some deep insight into the new offense. In fact, I told Katy that it was the best chalk talk I have attended, since it actually helped fans understand basketball strategy.
The decision was made to leave the Princeton and go to the "flow offense." The reason for the change is that the Princeton is intricate and takes a lot of time to learn, but our perimeter players were young and inexperienced. We needed an offense that was simpler and could be run right away. This in my view is probably the reason that we can use a freshman point guard.
What is the flow offense? I am going to spend some time watching videos and studying this, but as Katy described it, it usually uses two bigs. We try to work it inside, and if that is not feasible, the bigs begin to set screens for our perimeter players. It "flows" from a screen on one side to a screen on the other, etc. until someone gets open.
Katy also explained how our offense and the plays get called. The main call is the formation our players are going to take up on offense. It could be "2 in 3 out," "1 in 4 out," or even "5 out." There are individual plays that can be called from the formations, and Tara communicates those plays to the point guard. As Katy said, "Tara will call plays all game long." However, most of the time the point guard is looking for plays at the start of set, and there is a kind of default about looking inside and then setting up the mirror image flow. For example, when it became clear that Gonzaga was zoning us and shutting down entrance passes, we went to a "1 in 4 out" to maximize our shooters on the perimeter, and that was the dominant formation we saw today. However, the "2 in 3 out" is what we usually want to run, since our greatest strength is in posts.
Other tidbits from the chalk talk, Katy was effusive in her praise of Lepolo, "she has eyes in the back of her head." "If anyone is open on the court she will find them." When someone asked about the occasions when Brink got to the low post, turned, had her hands up and screamed for the ball--but Lepolo did not get her the ball--Katy said "it could have been a decoy, or possibly just inexperience."
Chalk Talk and Behind the Bench
For those of you who could not attend the before-and-after meetings, they were very informative. I would say that due to astute questions that were asked of Katy and Tara, we got some deep insight into the new offense. In fact, I told Katy that it was the best chalk talk I have attended, since it actually helped fans understand basketball strategy.
The decision was made to leave the Princeton and go to the "flow offense." The reason for the change is that the Princeton is intricate and takes a lot of time to learn, but our perimeter players were young and inexperienced. We needed an offense that was simpler and could be run right away. This in my view is probably the reason that we can use a freshman point guard.
What is the flow offense? I am going to spend some time watching videos and studying this, but as Katy described it, it usually uses two bigs. We try to work it inside, and if that is not feasible, the bigs begin to set screens for our perimeter players. It "flows" from a screen on one side to a screen on the other, etc. until someone gets open.
Katy also explained how our offense and the plays get called. The main call is the formation our players are going to take up on offense. It could be "2 in 3 out," "1 in 4 out," or even "5 out." There are individual plays that can be called from the formations, and Tara communicates those plays to the point guard. As Katy said, "Tara will call plays all game long." However, most of the time the point guard is looking for plays at the start of set, and there is a kind of default about looking inside and then setting up the mirror image flow. For example, when it became clear that Gonzaga was zoning us and shutting down entrance passes, we went to a "1 in 4 out" to maximize our shooters on the perimeter, and that was the dominant formation we saw today. However, the "2 in 3 out" is what we usually want to run, since our greatest strength is in posts.
Other tidbits from the chalk talk, Katy was effusive in her praise of Lepolo, "she has eyes in the back of her head." "If anyone is open on the court she will find them." When someone asked about the occasions when Brink got to the low post, turned, had her hands up and screamed for the ball--but Lepolo did not get her the ball--Katy said "it could have been a decoy, or possibly just inexperience."
For those of you who could not attend the before-and-after meetings, they were very informative. I would say that due to astute questions that were asked of Katy and Tara, we got some deep insight into the new offense. In fact, I told Katy that it was the best chalk talk I have attended, since it actually helped fans understand basketball strategy.
The decision was made to leave the Princeton and go to the "flow offense." The reason for the change is that the Princeton is intricate and takes a lot of time to learn, but our perimeter players were young and inexperienced. We needed an offense that was simpler and could be run right away. This in my view is probably the reason that we can use a freshman point guard.
What is the flow offense? I am going to spend some time watching videos and studying this, but as Katy described it, it usually uses two bigs. We try to work it inside, and if that is not feasible, the bigs begin to set screens for our perimeter players. It "flows" from a screen on one side to a screen on the other, etc. until someone gets open.
Katy also explained how our offense and the plays get called. The main call is the formation our players are going to take up on offense. It could be "2 in 3 out," "1 in 4 out," or even "5 out." There are individual plays that can be called from the formations, and Tara communicates those plays to the point guard. As Katy said, "Tara will call plays all game long." However, most of the time the point guard is looking for plays at the start of set, and there is a kind of default about looking inside and then setting up the mirror image flow. For example, when it became clear that Gonzaga was zoning us and shutting down entrance passes, we went to a "1 in 4 out" to maximize our shooters on the perimeter, and that was the dominant formation we saw today. However, the "2 in 3 out" is what we usually want to run, since our greatest strength is in posts.
Other tidbits from the chalk talk, Katy was effusive in her praise of Lepolo, "she has eyes in the back of her head." "If anyone is open on the court she will find them." When someone asked about the occasions when Brink got to the low post, turned, had her hands up and screamed for the ball--but Lepolo did not get her the ball--Katy said "it could have been a decoy, or possibly just inexperience."
12-04-2022, 04:46 PM
Brink's best game since last season -- 14 points, 16 rebounds, only 1 foul, played 31 minutes. If she can keep this up . . . Also glad to see so much from Demetre. I've really questioned her playing time in some earlier games, but this time she really justified being on the floor. Good win! Not let's keep it going. I love the fact that of the 13 people who played, 12 scored. And all those threes! Wish I could have been there, but at least I was able to watch it on TV.
Brink's best game since last season -- 14 points, 16 rebounds, only 1 foul, played 31 minutes. If she can keep this up . . . Also glad to see so much from Demetre. I've really questioned her playing time in some earlier games, but this time she really justified being on the floor. Good win! Not let's keep it going. I love the fact that of the 13 people who played, 12 scored. And all those threes! Wish I could have been there, but at least I was able to watch it on TV.
My observations on the game:
Overall:
Gonzaga was down to 7 players. Tennessee played them rough and they sustained two injuries in that game. Another player went out with a different injury. And apparently mono knocked out a couple players for today. So we were not playing a full strength Gonzaga team. Despite this, Gonzaga came to play and played us tight early on. Have to respect them for making it a close game (for a time) with half the players we had available.
Positives:
1. Brink played 31 minutes with only 1 foul. She was visibly restraining herself and more in control. As a result, she got a double double with 14 points and 16 rebounds against a physical zone offense that was giving up nothing in the paint.
2. Demetre had a break out game, scoring 17 points and at one point going 4/5 from three point range. Gonzaga was giving us the three point shot and it was Demetre who made them pay a high price for that stategy.
3. Jones had 6 assists and 0 turnovers--her most outstanding game for facilitation probably ever. She also had 12 points.
4. Jump had a terrific second half. Her first half was pedestrian, but she was 4/5 from three point range in the second.
5. Our second half defense on Kaylynne Truong was good--holding their hottest scorer to 2 points. Tara noted that fixing our defense on this "crafty, clever" player was a priority at halftime.
6. Our defense against Yvonne Ejim was excellent all game--holding their leading scorer to 8 points.
7. Rebounding was generally good.
8. 39 bench points.
9. We shot 54% from three point range and made a whopping 15 treys.
Negatives:
1. Defense on Kaylynne Truong in the first half was woeful. She scored from everywhere, including 4/7 treys, for 20 points. Tara sent Lepolo, Nivar, Emma-Nnopu to guard her and they all essentially failed in that half. As Tara said, they "all learned a lesson." Truong had techniques that shook her defenders and got her open over and over.
2. Lepolo had 3 assists and 3 turnovers, and seemed somewhat mortal, particularly in the first half when she could not stay with Truong. Part of the freshman learning curve.
3. Attendance at 3731 was about half what it was for South Carolina.
4. Points-in-the-paint. We had a 26-18 advantage. One might think that with our posts and Gonzaga's depleted team we should have done much better inside. Clearly we struggled to get it inside versus the zone. Gonzaga is not primarily a zone team--they may have installed it just for us, or perhaps they installed it once they knew they only had 7 players.
Conclusion:
A nice win that we should all be pleased to get. Hopefully it won't give us false confidence going forward considering we were playing 1/2 of a Gonzaga team. Tara seemed to think our players would learn some important lessons.
Now two weeks off for finals, then a very angry Tennessee and a superb Creighton and then Cal, all three within a few days.
Our highlights on Pac 12 site:
https://pac-12.com/videos/no-2-stanford-...23-gonzaga
Post game interview with Demetre. Both of her parents were athletes for Gonzaga!
https://pac-12.com/videos/stanfords-broo...23-gonzaga
Mary Murphy final commentary on the game.
https://pac-12.com/videos/mary-murphy-ev...23-gonzaga
Overall:
Gonzaga was down to 7 players. Tennessee played them rough and they sustained two injuries in that game. Another player went out with a different injury. And apparently mono knocked out a couple players for today. So we were not playing a full strength Gonzaga team. Despite this, Gonzaga came to play and played us tight early on. Have to respect them for making it a close game (for a time) with half the players we had available.
Positives:
1. Brink played 31 minutes with only 1 foul. She was visibly restraining herself and more in control. As a result, she got a double double with 14 points and 16 rebounds against a physical zone offense that was giving up nothing in the paint.
2. Demetre had a break out game, scoring 17 points and at one point going 4/5 from three point range. Gonzaga was giving us the three point shot and it was Demetre who made them pay a high price for that stategy.
3. Jones had 6 assists and 0 turnovers--her most outstanding game for facilitation probably ever. She also had 12 points.
4. Jump had a terrific second half. Her first half was pedestrian, but she was 4/5 from three point range in the second.
5. Our second half defense on Kaylynne Truong was good--holding their hottest scorer to 2 points. Tara noted that fixing our defense on this "crafty, clever" player was a priority at halftime.
6. Our defense against Yvonne Ejim was excellent all game--holding their leading scorer to 8 points.
7. Rebounding was generally good.
8. 39 bench points.
9. We shot 54% from three point range and made a whopping 15 treys.
Negatives:
1. Defense on Kaylynne Truong in the first half was woeful. She scored from everywhere, including 4/7 treys, for 20 points. Tara sent Lepolo, Nivar, Emma-Nnopu to guard her and they all essentially failed in that half. As Tara said, they "all learned a lesson." Truong had techniques that shook her defenders and got her open over and over.
2. Lepolo had 3 assists and 3 turnovers, and seemed somewhat mortal, particularly in the first half when she could not stay with Truong. Part of the freshman learning curve.
3. Attendance at 3731 was about half what it was for South Carolina.
4. Points-in-the-paint. We had a 26-18 advantage. One might think that with our posts and Gonzaga's depleted team we should have done much better inside. Clearly we struggled to get it inside versus the zone. Gonzaga is not primarily a zone team--they may have installed it just for us, or perhaps they installed it once they knew they only had 7 players.
Conclusion:
A nice win that we should all be pleased to get. Hopefully it won't give us false confidence going forward considering we were playing 1/2 of a Gonzaga team. Tara seemed to think our players would learn some important lessons.
Now two weeks off for finals, then a very angry Tennessee and a superb Creighton and then Cal, all three within a few days.
Our highlights on Pac 12 site:
https://pac-12.com/videos/no-2-stanford-...23-gonzaga
Post game interview with Demetre. Both of her parents were athletes for Gonzaga!
https://pac-12.com/videos/stanfords-broo...23-gonzaga
Mary Murphy final commentary on the game.
https://pac-12.com/videos/mary-murphy-ev...23-gonzaga
My observations on the game:
Overall:
Gonzaga was down to 7 players. Tennessee played them rough and they sustained two injuries in that game. Another player went out with a different injury. And apparently mono knocked out a couple players for today. So we were not playing a full strength Gonzaga team. Despite this, Gonzaga came to play and played us tight early on. Have to respect them for making it a close game (for a time) with half the players we had available.
Positives:
1. Brink played 31 minutes with only 1 foul. She was visibly restraining herself and more in control. As a result, she got a double double with 14 points and 16 rebounds against a physical zone offense that was giving up nothing in the paint.
2. Demetre had a break out game, scoring 17 points and at one point going 4/5 from three point range. Gonzaga was giving us the three point shot and it was Demetre who made them pay a high price for that stategy.
3. Jones had 6 assists and 0 turnovers--her most outstanding game for facilitation probably ever. She also had 12 points.
4. Jump had a terrific second half. Her first half was pedestrian, but she was 4/5 from three point range in the second.
5. Our second half defense on Kaylynne Truong was good--holding their hottest scorer to 2 points. Tara noted that fixing our defense on this "crafty, clever" player was a priority at halftime.
6. Our defense against Yvonne Ejim was excellent all game--holding their leading scorer to 8 points.
7. Rebounding was generally good.
8. 39 bench points.
9. We shot 54% from three point range and made a whopping 15 treys.
Negatives:
1. Defense on Kaylynne Truong in the first half was woeful. She scored from everywhere, including 4/7 treys, for 20 points. Tara sent Lepolo, Nivar, Emma-Nnopu to guard her and they all essentially failed in that half. As Tara said, they "all learned a lesson." Truong had techniques that shook her defenders and got her open over and over.
2. Lepolo had 3 assists and 3 turnovers, and seemed somewhat mortal, particularly in the first half when she could not stay with Truong. Part of the freshman learning curve.
3. Attendance at 3731 was about half what it was for South Carolina.
4. Points-in-the-paint. We had a 26-18 advantage. One might think that with our posts and Gonzaga's depleted team we should have done much better inside. Clearly we struggled to get it inside versus the zone. Gonzaga is not primarily a zone team--they may have installed it just for us, or perhaps they installed it once they knew they only had 7 players.
Conclusion:
A nice win that we should all be pleased to get. Hopefully it won't give us false confidence going forward considering we were playing 1/2 of a Gonzaga team. Tara seemed to think our players would learn some important lessons.
Now two weeks off for finals, then a very angry Tennessee and a superb Creighton and then Cal, all three within a few days.
Our highlights on Pac 12 site:
https://pac-12.com/videos/no-2-stanford-...23-gonzaga
Post game interview with Demetre. Both of her parents were athletes for Gonzaga!
https://pac-12.com/videos/stanfords-broo...23-gonzaga
Mary Murphy final commentary on the game.
https://pac-12.com/videos/mary-murphy-ev...23-gonzaga
Overall:
Gonzaga was down to 7 players. Tennessee played them rough and they sustained two injuries in that game. Another player went out with a different injury. And apparently mono knocked out a couple players for today. So we were not playing a full strength Gonzaga team. Despite this, Gonzaga came to play and played us tight early on. Have to respect them for making it a close game (for a time) with half the players we had available.
Positives:
1. Brink played 31 minutes with only 1 foul. She was visibly restraining herself and more in control. As a result, she got a double double with 14 points and 16 rebounds against a physical zone offense that was giving up nothing in the paint.
2. Demetre had a break out game, scoring 17 points and at one point going 4/5 from three point range. Gonzaga was giving us the three point shot and it was Demetre who made them pay a high price for that stategy.
3. Jones had 6 assists and 0 turnovers--her most outstanding game for facilitation probably ever. She also had 12 points.
4. Jump had a terrific second half. Her first half was pedestrian, but she was 4/5 from three point range in the second.
5. Our second half defense on Kaylynne Truong was good--holding their hottest scorer to 2 points. Tara noted that fixing our defense on this "crafty, clever" player was a priority at halftime.
6. Our defense against Yvonne Ejim was excellent all game--holding their leading scorer to 8 points.
7. Rebounding was generally good.
8. 39 bench points.
9. We shot 54% from three point range and made a whopping 15 treys.
Negatives:
1. Defense on Kaylynne Truong in the first half was woeful. She scored from everywhere, including 4/7 treys, for 20 points. Tara sent Lepolo, Nivar, Emma-Nnopu to guard her and they all essentially failed in that half. As Tara said, they "all learned a lesson." Truong had techniques that shook her defenders and got her open over and over.
2. Lepolo had 3 assists and 3 turnovers, and seemed somewhat mortal, particularly in the first half when she could not stay with Truong. Part of the freshman learning curve.
3. Attendance at 3731 was about half what it was for South Carolina.
4. Points-in-the-paint. We had a 26-18 advantage. One might think that with our posts and Gonzaga's depleted team we should have done much better inside. Clearly we struggled to get it inside versus the zone. Gonzaga is not primarily a zone team--they may have installed it just for us, or perhaps they installed it once they knew they only had 7 players.
Conclusion:
A nice win that we should all be pleased to get. Hopefully it won't give us false confidence going forward considering we were playing 1/2 of a Gonzaga team. Tara seemed to think our players would learn some important lessons.
Now two weeks off for finals, then a very angry Tennessee and a superb Creighton and then Cal, all three within a few days.
Our highlights on Pac 12 site:
https://pac-12.com/videos/no-2-stanford-...23-gonzaga
Post game interview with Demetre. Both of her parents were athletes for Gonzaga!
https://pac-12.com/videos/stanfords-broo...23-gonzaga
Mary Murphy final commentary on the game.
https://pac-12.com/videos/mary-murphy-ev...23-gonzaga
12-04-2022, 05:33 PM
When I saw that the coaches subbed so liberally and even had Brink sitting down with zero fouls to her name, I knew the coaches felt we had the game pretty well locked down even before the score difference climbed. Troung was very tricky and found ways to get her shots off for a while. We defended better in the second half and she cooled off as well. I don't think the Zags were themselves totally due to the injuries. Hope they get their players back. They play hard and are very well coached, as Tara said at the post-game.
It was fun to see so many different players hit threes and great to see Demetre have such a good game. Also good to see Jones run some point and do it well, and hit some of her trademark shots. Her three looked good and I hope she will take more of them when in rhythm.
It was fun to see so many different players hit threes and great to see Demetre have such a good game. Also good to see Jones run some point and do it well, and hit some of her trademark shots. Her three looked good and I hope she will take more of them when in rhythm.
When I saw that the coaches subbed so liberally and even had Brink sitting down with zero fouls to her name, I knew the coaches felt we had the game pretty well locked down even before the score difference climbed. Troung was very tricky and found ways to get her shots off for a while. We defended better in the second half and she cooled off as well. I don't think the Zags were themselves totally due to the injuries. Hope they get their players back. They play hard and are very well coached, as Tara said at the post-game.
It was fun to see so many different players hit threes and great to see Demetre have such a good game. Also good to see Jones run some point and do it well, and hit some of her trademark shots. Her three looked good and I hope she will take more of them when in rhythm.
It was fun to see so many different players hit threes and great to see Demetre have such a good game. Also good to see Jones run some point and do it well, and hit some of her trademark shots. Her three looked good and I hope she will take more of them when in rhythm.
(12-04-2022, 05:01 PM)81alum Wrote: Jump had a terrific second half. Her first half was pedestrian, but she was 4/5 from three point range in the second.
i believe that hannah also made 2 threes that were waved off for moving screens away from the ball. one, maybe both, contributed to that first-half drought.
does anyone recall the stanford individual record for 3-point shots made in a season? i have a vague memory that it's jeanette or kiana with 90-something, but i can't find it online. hannah currently leads the nation in 3 point shots made with 37 in 11 games. at this pace she will hit 110 or so.
(12-04-2022, 05:01 PM)81alum Wrote: Jump had a terrific second half. Her first half was pedestrian, but she was 4/5 from three point range in the second.
i believe that hannah also made 2 threes that were waved off for moving screens away from the ball. one, maybe both, contributed to that first-half drought.
does anyone recall the stanford individual record for 3-point shots made in a season? i have a vague memory that it's jeanette or kiana with 90-something, but i can't find it online. hannah currently leads the nation in 3 point shots made with 37 in 11 games. at this pace she will hit 110 or so.
12-04-2022, 07:34 PM
(12-04-2022, 07:09 PM)jonnyss Wrote:Karlie and Jeanette are tied for the single season lead with 96. At 37 Jump in not yet halfway there.(12-04-2022, 05:01 PM)81alum Wrote: Jump had a terrific second half. Her first half was pedestrian, but she was 4/5 from three point range in the second.
i believe that hannah also made 2 threes that were waved off for moving screens away from the ball. one, maybe both, contributed to that first-half drought.
does anyone recall the stanford individual record for 3-point shots made in a season? i have a vague memory that it's jeanette or kiana with 90-something, but i can't find it online. hannah currently leads the nation in 3 point shots made with 37 in 11 games. at this pace she will hit 110 or so.
However, in terms of 3 pt field goal percentage, Jump is currently at a whopping 52%. The Stanford leader is Jennifer Azzi at 49.5 %.
(12-04-2022, 07:09 PM)jonnyss Wrote:Karlie and Jeanette are tied for the single season lead with 96. At 37 Jump in not yet halfway there.(12-04-2022, 05:01 PM)81alum Wrote: Jump had a terrific second half. Her first half was pedestrian, but she was 4/5 from three point range in the second.
i believe that hannah also made 2 threes that were waved off for moving screens away from the ball. one, maybe both, contributed to that first-half drought.
does anyone recall the stanford individual record for 3-point shots made in a season? i have a vague memory that it's jeanette or kiana with 90-something, but i can't find it online. hannah currently leads the nation in 3 point shots made with 37 in 11 games. at this pace she will hit 110 or so.
However, in terms of 3 pt field goal percentage, Jump is currently at a whopping 52%. The Stanford leader is Jennifer Azzi at 49.5 %.
(12-04-2022, 07:34 PM)81alum Wrote:(12-04-2022, 07:09 PM)jonnyss Wrote:Karlie and Jeanette are tied for the single season lead with 96. At 37 Jump in not yet halfway there.(12-04-2022, 05:01 PM)81alum Wrote: Jump had a terrific second half. Her first half was pedestrian, but she was 4/5 from three point range in the second.
i believe that hannah also made 2 threes that were waved off for moving screens away from the ball. one, maybe both, contributed to that first-half drought.
does anyone recall the stanford individual record for 3-point shots made in a season? i have a vague memory that it's jeanette or kiana with 90-something, but i can't find it online. hannah currently leads the nation in 3 point shots made with 37 in 11 games. at this pace she will hit 110 or so.
However, in terms of 3 pt field goal percentage, Jump is currently at a whopping 52%. The Stanford leader is Jennifer Azzi at 49.5 %.
thank you. in the past 5 years, stanford has played between 33 and 36 games in a season, so hannah likely has 2/3 or more of the season remaining.
(12-04-2022, 07:34 PM)81alum Wrote:(12-04-2022, 07:09 PM)jonnyss Wrote:Karlie and Jeanette are tied for the single season lead with 96. At 37 Jump in not yet halfway there.(12-04-2022, 05:01 PM)81alum Wrote: Jump had a terrific second half. Her first half was pedestrian, but she was 4/5 from three point range in the second.
i believe that hannah also made 2 threes that were waved off for moving screens away from the ball. one, maybe both, contributed to that first-half drought.
does anyone recall the stanford individual record for 3-point shots made in a season? i have a vague memory that it's jeanette or kiana with 90-something, but i can't find it online. hannah currently leads the nation in 3 point shots made with 37 in 11 games. at this pace she will hit 110 or so.
However, in terms of 3 pt field goal percentage, Jump is currently at a whopping 52%. The Stanford leader is Jennifer Azzi at 49.5 %.
thank you. in the past 5 years, stanford has played between 33 and 36 games in a season, so hannah likely has 2/3 or more of the season remaining.
(12-04-2022, 07:44 PM)jonnyss Wrote: thank you. in the past 5 years, stanford has played between 33 and 36 games in a season, so hannah likely has 2/3 or more of the season remaining.If she keeps shooting 50% and if she stays healthy, she will easily break--even shatter that record.
And if she comes back for a 5th year as is rumored, she might make the career record. She was at 183 and 13th on the all time list before this season. Kianna Williams leads with 311. She could add a couple hundred to her 183 with two seasons. I doubt she can catch Kiana this year, though.
Jump is already up to 3rd on the all time list for percentage made, at 41% (150 minimum). Catching Azzi at 45% will be tough, but if she keeps shooting the way she has so far this year it is possible.
(12-04-2022, 07:44 PM)jonnyss Wrote: thank you. in the past 5 years, stanford has played between 33 and 36 games in a season, so hannah likely has 2/3 or more of the season remaining.If she keeps shooting 50% and if she stays healthy, she will easily break--even shatter that record.
And if she comes back for a 5th year as is rumored, she might make the career record. She was at 183 and 13th on the all time list before this season. Kianna Williams leads with 311. She could add a couple hundred to her 183 with two seasons. I doubt she can catch Kiana this year, though.
Jump is already up to 3rd on the all time list for percentage made, at 41% (150 minimum). Catching Azzi at 45% will be tough, but if she keeps shooting the way she has so far this year it is possible.
12-04-2022, 10:39 PM
The 3-point line has been moved outward a couple of times since Azzi's day. If Wikipedia is right, it moved from 19'9", to 20'9", then to 22'2". Breaking a percentage record from the 19'9” days at today's distance would be impressive!
The 3-point line has been moved outward a couple of times since Azzi's day. If Wikipedia is right, it moved from 19'9", to 20'9", then to 22'2". Breaking a percentage record from the 19'9” days at today's distance would be impressive!
12-04-2022, 11:08 PM
Pretty quiet game for Haley but there she is in the box score with 12 pts. We started posting her down low in the second half and that seemed to free her up.
Wow Cam was just awesome, wasn't she?
Zags played pretty disciplined D and they never quit swarming to the ball. When they are back at full strength they will be very tough.
It seemed like an eternity in the first half before we took an open shot. I think the Zags closed out Q1 on a 10-2 run.
Prechtel is the one player with really untapped potential, IMHO. She does not seem to have good hands, doesn't hang on to the ball at times. But all in all I don't think we lose much when she subs in for Iriafen.
#14 Truong, wow what a tough cookie. I'm glad Tara figured out how to defend her in the 2nd half.
This was a deceptive game. On any given day, we are not 20 points better than they are. But shooting above 50% from 3 (61% at one point!), and making 11/12 FTs will do it every time.
Wow Cam was just awesome, wasn't she?
Zags played pretty disciplined D and they never quit swarming to the ball. When they are back at full strength they will be very tough.
It seemed like an eternity in the first half before we took an open shot. I think the Zags closed out Q1 on a 10-2 run.
Prechtel is the one player with really untapped potential, IMHO. She does not seem to have good hands, doesn't hang on to the ball at times. But all in all I don't think we lose much when she subs in for Iriafen.
#14 Truong, wow what a tough cookie. I'm glad Tara figured out how to defend her in the 2nd half.
This was a deceptive game. On any given day, we are not 20 points better than they are. But shooting above 50% from 3 (61% at one point!), and making 11/12 FTs will do it every time.
Pretty quiet game for Haley but there she is in the box score with 12 pts. We started posting her down low in the second half and that seemed to free her up.
Wow Cam was just awesome, wasn't she?
Zags played pretty disciplined D and they never quit swarming to the ball. When they are back at full strength they will be very tough.
It seemed like an eternity in the first half before we took an open shot. I think the Zags closed out Q1 on a 10-2 run.
Prechtel is the one player with really untapped potential, IMHO. She does not seem to have good hands, doesn't hang on to the ball at times. But all in all I don't think we lose much when she subs in for Iriafen.
#14 Truong, wow what a tough cookie. I'm glad Tara figured out how to defend her in the 2nd half.
This was a deceptive game. On any given day, we are not 20 points better than they are. But shooting above 50% from 3 (61% at one point!), and making 11/12 FTs will do it every time.
Wow Cam was just awesome, wasn't she?
Zags played pretty disciplined D and they never quit swarming to the ball. When they are back at full strength they will be very tough.
It seemed like an eternity in the first half before we took an open shot. I think the Zags closed out Q1 on a 10-2 run.
Prechtel is the one player with really untapped potential, IMHO. She does not seem to have good hands, doesn't hang on to the ball at times. But all in all I don't think we lose much when she subs in for Iriafen.
#14 Truong, wow what a tough cookie. I'm glad Tara figured out how to defend her in the 2nd half.
This was a deceptive game. On any given day, we are not 20 points better than they are. But shooting above 50% from 3 (61% at one point!), and making 11/12 FTs will do it every time.
12-05-2022, 03:48 AM
(12-04-2022, 07:09 PM)jonnyss Wrote:She had one waved off in each half.(12-04-2022, 05:01 PM)81alum Wrote: Jump had a terrific second half. Her first half was pedestrian, but she was 4/5 from three point range in the second.
i believe that hannah also made 2 threes that were waved off for moving screens away from the ball. one, maybe both, contributed to that first-half drought.
(12-04-2022, 07:09 PM)jonnyss Wrote:She had one waved off in each half.(12-04-2022, 05:01 PM)81alum Wrote: Jump had a terrific second half. Her first half was pedestrian, but she was 4/5 from three point range in the second.
i believe that hannah also made 2 threes that were waved off for moving screens away from the ball. one, maybe both, contributed to that first-half drought.
I couldn't find "Most players with a 3pt FG in a single game" record. However, I did find a game where 10 players on one team hit 3 pointers. The 11th player on the team tried 5 times but didn't get it to go in. 28 of 59 3pt (19 of 32 2pt). They had twice the number of shots (91 !!) than the other team (30 steals contributed to that). The starters played about half the game. By quarter: 8/19, 7/16, 6/14, 7/10 3FG/3FGA.
Western Illinois vs MacMurray, 136-39
In their next game (against Purdue), they went 4 of 25 for 3FGA. Then 8 of 29 and then 5 of 18.
In the previous season they had at least 2 games with 7 players making 3 pointers.
NCAA records include
Three-Point Field Goals: 28—Western Ill. vs. MacMurray, Nov. 12, 2018 (59 attempts)
Three-Point Field Goals, Both Teams: 36—Denver (18) vs. Western Ill. (18), Jan. 24, 2018 (72 attempts)
Consecutive Three-Point Field Goals: 13—NC State vs. Virginia, March 1, 2020
Three-Point Field-Goal Percentage
(Min. 8 made) 100.0%—Idaho St. vs. Southern Utah, Dec. 4, 1990 (9 of 9); Colgate vs. Lehigh, Jan. 14, 1995 (8 of 8)
(Min. 12 made) 85.7%—Tennessee vs. Navy, Nov. 13, 2016 (12 of 14)
Three-Point Field-Goal Percentage, Both Teams (Min. 15 made) 85.2%—Eastern Ill. (16 of 20) vs. Indiana St. (7 of 7), Jan. 21, 1988 (23 of 27)
Three-Point Field Goals - Game 14 Juicy Landrum, Baylor vs. Arkansas St. Dec. 18, 2019
Three-Point Field Goals - Season: 154—Taylor Pierce, Idaho, 2019 (389 attempts)
Three-Point Field Goals - Career 497—Kelsey Mitchell, Ohio St., 2015-18 (1,286 attempts)
I did find a mention of a high school player that hit 11 in the first half and then the team decided to go for a record. She wound up with 19.
Stanford records can be found here.
Three-Point Field Goals - Game: 9 Lindsey Yamasaki at Washington 2/24/01, Molly Goodenbour at Tennessee 12/21/93
Three-Point Field Goals - Season: 96 Karlie Samuelson 2016-17, Jeanette Pohlen 2010-11
Three-Point Field Goals - Career: 311 Kiana Williams 2017-21
Three-Point Percent - Season: .495 Jennifer Azzi 1988-89
Three-Point Percent - Career: .452 Jennifer Azzi 1986-90
Something seems amiss. Azzi (1986-1990) is listed as having a career 3FG% of 0.452, with 1988-89 season being 0.489 and the 1989-1990 season as being 0.442. Tara reminded us today that the NCAA adopted the 3pt line in 1988. That makes sense that her career 3Fg% is between those two season numbers. However, Azzi is also listed as having 191 career 3FGs. If she only had those two years, then she must have hit at least 96 one of the years, which would put her at least tied for the Stanford season record in 3FG. Why isn't Azzi listed in the season 3FG category?
And, what about Katy Steding as well? She also had just two years overlap with the 3PT rule. In 1988-1989, she shot 0.446 for 3FG% and in 1989-1990, she shot 0.464. Her career average should be between those two, but it isn't listed in the Stanford records (which go as low as 0.389) or in the NCAA records (which go as low as 0.440). (Azzi is listed in the NCAA records for career 3FG%.) Conceivably, Steding didn't have enough 3FG to be listed in the stats (min 150 3FG).
The 1988-1989 team had a 28-3 record with an average score of 80+. The 1989-1990 NC team was 32-1 with 10 100+ point games and probably averaged close to 90 points. I know Azzi was hitting a lot of 3s.
For the NC game: "Stanford got strong contributions from Sonja Henning (21 points, nine rebounds), Katy Steding (18 points, 6-for-15 on 3-pointers, five assists), Jennifer Azzi (17 points, 4-for-8 from beyond the arc, five assists) and Trisha Stevens (16 points, 10 rebounds)." (See also this SI article)
Western Illinois vs MacMurray, 136-39
In their next game (against Purdue), they went 4 of 25 for 3FGA. Then 8 of 29 and then 5 of 18.
In the previous season they had at least 2 games with 7 players making 3 pointers.
NCAA records include
Three-Point Field Goals: 28—Western Ill. vs. MacMurray, Nov. 12, 2018 (59 attempts)
Three-Point Field Goals, Both Teams: 36—Denver (18) vs. Western Ill. (18), Jan. 24, 2018 (72 attempts)
Consecutive Three-Point Field Goals: 13—NC State vs. Virginia, March 1, 2020
Three-Point Field-Goal Percentage
(Min. 8 made) 100.0%—Idaho St. vs. Southern Utah, Dec. 4, 1990 (9 of 9); Colgate vs. Lehigh, Jan. 14, 1995 (8 of 8)
(Min. 12 made) 85.7%—Tennessee vs. Navy, Nov. 13, 2016 (12 of 14)
Three-Point Field-Goal Percentage, Both Teams (Min. 15 made) 85.2%—Eastern Ill. (16 of 20) vs. Indiana St. (7 of 7), Jan. 21, 1988 (23 of 27)
Three-Point Field Goals - Game 14 Juicy Landrum, Baylor vs. Arkansas St. Dec. 18, 2019
Three-Point Field Goals - Season: 154—Taylor Pierce, Idaho, 2019 (389 attempts)
Three-Point Field Goals - Career 497—Kelsey Mitchell, Ohio St., 2015-18 (1,286 attempts)
I did find a mention of a high school player that hit 11 in the first half and then the team decided to go for a record. She wound up with 19.
Stanford records can be found here.
Three-Point Field Goals - Game: 9 Lindsey Yamasaki at Washington 2/24/01, Molly Goodenbour at Tennessee 12/21/93
Three-Point Field Goals - Season: 96 Karlie Samuelson 2016-17, Jeanette Pohlen 2010-11
Three-Point Field Goals - Career: 311 Kiana Williams 2017-21
Three-Point Percent - Season: .495 Jennifer Azzi 1988-89
Three-Point Percent - Career: .452 Jennifer Azzi 1986-90
Something seems amiss. Azzi (1986-1990) is listed as having a career 3FG% of 0.452, with 1988-89 season being 0.489 and the 1989-1990 season as being 0.442. Tara reminded us today that the NCAA adopted the 3pt line in 1988. That makes sense that her career 3Fg% is between those two season numbers. However, Azzi is also listed as having 191 career 3FGs. If she only had those two years, then she must have hit at least 96 one of the years, which would put her at least tied for the Stanford season record in 3FG. Why isn't Azzi listed in the season 3FG category?
And, what about Katy Steding as well? She also had just two years overlap with the 3PT rule. In 1988-1989, she shot 0.446 for 3FG% and in 1989-1990, she shot 0.464. Her career average should be between those two, but it isn't listed in the Stanford records (which go as low as 0.389) or in the NCAA records (which go as low as 0.440). (Azzi is listed in the NCAA records for career 3FG%.) Conceivably, Steding didn't have enough 3FG to be listed in the stats (min 150 3FG).
The 1988-1989 team had a 28-3 record with an average score of 80+. The 1989-1990 NC team was 32-1 with 10 100+ point games and probably averaged close to 90 points. I know Azzi was hitting a lot of 3s.
For the NC game: "Stanford got strong contributions from Sonja Henning (21 points, nine rebounds), Katy Steding (18 points, 6-for-15 on 3-pointers, five assists), Jennifer Azzi (17 points, 4-for-8 from beyond the arc, five assists) and Trisha Stevens (16 points, 10 rebounds)." (See also this SI article)
I couldn't find "Most players with a 3pt FG in a single game" record. However, I did find a game where 10 players on one team hit 3 pointers. The 11th player on the team tried 5 times but didn't get it to go in. 28 of 59 3pt (19 of 32 2pt). They had twice the number of shots (91 !!) than the other team (30 steals contributed to that). The starters played about half the game. By quarter: 8/19, 7/16, 6/14, 7/10 3FG/3FGA.
Western Illinois vs MacMurray, 136-39
In their next game (against Purdue), they went 4 of 25 for 3FGA. Then 8 of 29 and then 5 of 18.
In the previous season they had at least 2 games with 7 players making 3 pointers.
NCAA records include
Three-Point Field Goals: 28—Western Ill. vs. MacMurray, Nov. 12, 2018 (59 attempts)
Three-Point Field Goals, Both Teams: 36—Denver (18) vs. Western Ill. (18), Jan. 24, 2018 (72 attempts)
Consecutive Three-Point Field Goals: 13—NC State vs. Virginia, March 1, 2020
Three-Point Field-Goal Percentage
(Min. 8 made) 100.0%—Idaho St. vs. Southern Utah, Dec. 4, 1990 (9 of 9); Colgate vs. Lehigh, Jan. 14, 1995 (8 of 8)
(Min. 12 made) 85.7%—Tennessee vs. Navy, Nov. 13, 2016 (12 of 14)
Three-Point Field-Goal Percentage, Both Teams (Min. 15 made) 85.2%—Eastern Ill. (16 of 20) vs. Indiana St. (7 of 7), Jan. 21, 1988 (23 of 27)
Three-Point Field Goals - Game 14 Juicy Landrum, Baylor vs. Arkansas St. Dec. 18, 2019
Three-Point Field Goals - Season: 154—Taylor Pierce, Idaho, 2019 (389 attempts)
Three-Point Field Goals - Career 497—Kelsey Mitchell, Ohio St., 2015-18 (1,286 attempts)
I did find a mention of a high school player that hit 11 in the first half and then the team decided to go for a record. She wound up with 19.
Stanford records can be found here.
Three-Point Field Goals - Game: 9 Lindsey Yamasaki at Washington 2/24/01, Molly Goodenbour at Tennessee 12/21/93
Three-Point Field Goals - Season: 96 Karlie Samuelson 2016-17, Jeanette Pohlen 2010-11
Three-Point Field Goals - Career: 311 Kiana Williams 2017-21
Three-Point Percent - Season: .495 Jennifer Azzi 1988-89
Three-Point Percent - Career: .452 Jennifer Azzi 1986-90
Something seems amiss. Azzi (1986-1990) is listed as having a career 3FG% of 0.452, with 1988-89 season being 0.489 and the 1989-1990 season as being 0.442. Tara reminded us today that the NCAA adopted the 3pt line in 1988. That makes sense that her career 3Fg% is between those two season numbers. However, Azzi is also listed as having 191 career 3FGs. If she only had those two years, then she must have hit at least 96 one of the years, which would put her at least tied for the Stanford season record in 3FG. Why isn't Azzi listed in the season 3FG category?
And, what about Katy Steding as well? She also had just two years overlap with the 3PT rule. In 1988-1989, she shot 0.446 for 3FG% and in 1989-1990, she shot 0.464. Her career average should be between those two, but it isn't listed in the Stanford records (which go as low as 0.389) or in the NCAA records (which go as low as 0.440). (Azzi is listed in the NCAA records for career 3FG%.) Conceivably, Steding didn't have enough 3FG to be listed in the stats (min 150 3FG).
The 1988-1989 team had a 28-3 record with an average score of 80+. The 1989-1990 NC team was 32-1 with 10 100+ point games and probably averaged close to 90 points. I know Azzi was hitting a lot of 3s.
For the NC game: "Stanford got strong contributions from Sonja Henning (21 points, nine rebounds), Katy Steding (18 points, 6-for-15 on 3-pointers, five assists), Jennifer Azzi (17 points, 4-for-8 from beyond the arc, five assists) and Trisha Stevens (16 points, 10 rebounds)." (See also this SI article)
Western Illinois vs MacMurray, 136-39
In their next game (against Purdue), they went 4 of 25 for 3FGA. Then 8 of 29 and then 5 of 18.
In the previous season they had at least 2 games with 7 players making 3 pointers.
NCAA records include
Three-Point Field Goals: 28—Western Ill. vs. MacMurray, Nov. 12, 2018 (59 attempts)
Three-Point Field Goals, Both Teams: 36—Denver (18) vs. Western Ill. (18), Jan. 24, 2018 (72 attempts)
Consecutive Three-Point Field Goals: 13—NC State vs. Virginia, March 1, 2020
Three-Point Field-Goal Percentage
(Min. 8 made) 100.0%—Idaho St. vs. Southern Utah, Dec. 4, 1990 (9 of 9); Colgate vs. Lehigh, Jan. 14, 1995 (8 of 8)
(Min. 12 made) 85.7%—Tennessee vs. Navy, Nov. 13, 2016 (12 of 14)
Three-Point Field-Goal Percentage, Both Teams (Min. 15 made) 85.2%—Eastern Ill. (16 of 20) vs. Indiana St. (7 of 7), Jan. 21, 1988 (23 of 27)
Three-Point Field Goals - Game 14 Juicy Landrum, Baylor vs. Arkansas St. Dec. 18, 2019
Three-Point Field Goals - Season: 154—Taylor Pierce, Idaho, 2019 (389 attempts)
Three-Point Field Goals - Career 497—Kelsey Mitchell, Ohio St., 2015-18 (1,286 attempts)
I did find a mention of a high school player that hit 11 in the first half and then the team decided to go for a record. She wound up with 19.
Stanford records can be found here.
Three-Point Field Goals - Game: 9 Lindsey Yamasaki at Washington 2/24/01, Molly Goodenbour at Tennessee 12/21/93
Three-Point Field Goals - Season: 96 Karlie Samuelson 2016-17, Jeanette Pohlen 2010-11
Three-Point Field Goals - Career: 311 Kiana Williams 2017-21
Three-Point Percent - Season: .495 Jennifer Azzi 1988-89
Three-Point Percent - Career: .452 Jennifer Azzi 1986-90
Something seems amiss. Azzi (1986-1990) is listed as having a career 3FG% of 0.452, with 1988-89 season being 0.489 and the 1989-1990 season as being 0.442. Tara reminded us today that the NCAA adopted the 3pt line in 1988. That makes sense that her career 3Fg% is between those two season numbers. However, Azzi is also listed as having 191 career 3FGs. If she only had those two years, then she must have hit at least 96 one of the years, which would put her at least tied for the Stanford season record in 3FG. Why isn't Azzi listed in the season 3FG category?
And, what about Katy Steding as well? She also had just two years overlap with the 3PT rule. In 1988-1989, she shot 0.446 for 3FG% and in 1989-1990, she shot 0.464. Her career average should be between those two, but it isn't listed in the Stanford records (which go as low as 0.389) or in the NCAA records (which go as low as 0.440). (Azzi is listed in the NCAA records for career 3FG%.) Conceivably, Steding didn't have enough 3FG to be listed in the stats (min 150 3FG).
The 1988-1989 team had a 28-3 record with an average score of 80+. The 1989-1990 NC team was 32-1 with 10 100+ point games and probably averaged close to 90 points. I know Azzi was hitting a lot of 3s.
For the NC game: "Stanford got strong contributions from Sonja Henning (21 points, nine rebounds), Katy Steding (18 points, 6-for-15 on 3-pointers, five assists), Jennifer Azzi (17 points, 4-for-8 from beyond the arc, five assists) and Trisha Stevens (16 points, 10 rebounds)." (See also this SI article)
12-05-2022, 05:22 AM
(12-05-2022, 04:49 AM)M T Wrote: Three-Point Field Goals - Career 497—Kelsey Mitchell, Ohio St., 2015-18 (1,286 attempts)I remember we played against her a few years back. It was our first game of the year in 2017, and she went off on us for 30 points. McPhee had 24 but it wasn't enough. Then we played them again in a tournament a few weeks later and lost again. In that game Smith came alive for 33, and Anna Wilson hit 7/8 three point shots. But Kelsey Mitchell had 37, including 19/20 free throws.
2017-18 was our most "down" year since 2000-2001.
(12-05-2022, 04:49 AM)M T Wrote: Three-Point Field Goals - Career 497—Kelsey Mitchell, Ohio St., 2015-18 (1,286 attempts)I remember we played against her a few years back. It was our first game of the year in 2017, and she went off on us for 30 points. McPhee had 24 but it wasn't enough. Then we played them again in a tournament a few weeks later and lost again. In that game Smith came alive for 33, and Anna Wilson hit 7/8 three point shots. But Kelsey Mitchell had 37, including 19/20 free throws.
2017-18 was our most "down" year since 2000-2001.
12-05-2022, 11:31 AM
We need to find more ways to get Hannah and her 3pt shot involved in our half-court offense. Too often, once we settle into a half-court offense, Hannah is positioned at one corner, the defense assigns one player to guard her, and the game becomes a 4-on-4. Of her four 3 pt makes yesterday, two came from kick-outs during transition/fast break offense and one came from a kick-out after an offensive rebound.
One way would be to bring her up to the elbow instead of having her stay in the corner. IIRC yesterday we did that twice and she hit her shots, but unfortunately they were waved off for moving screens.
One way would be to bring her up to the elbow instead of having her stay in the corner. IIRC yesterday we did that twice and she hit her shots, but unfortunately they were waved off for moving screens.
We need to find more ways to get Hannah and her 3pt shot involved in our half-court offense. Too often, once we settle into a half-court offense, Hannah is positioned at one corner, the defense assigns one player to guard her, and the game becomes a 4-on-4. Of her four 3 pt makes yesterday, two came from kick-outs during transition/fast break offense and one came from a kick-out after an offensive rebound.
One way would be to bring her up to the elbow instead of having her stay in the corner. IIRC yesterday we did that twice and she hit her shots, but unfortunately they were waved off for moving screens.
One way would be to bring her up to the elbow instead of having her stay in the corner. IIRC yesterday we did that twice and she hit her shots, but unfortunately they were waved off for moving screens.
12-05-2022, 12:50 PM
(12-04-2022, 08:32 PM)81alum Wrote:Kiana played 4332 minutes for Stanford. Jump has played less than half that so far (1911). Kianna averaged a made 3 pointer for every 13.9 minutes of playing time. Jump has averaged a 3 pointer every 8.7 minutes (one every 7.9 minutes so far this season).(12-04-2022, 07:44 PM)jonnyss Wrote: thank you. in the past 5 years, stanford has played between 33 and 36 games in a season, so hannah likely has 2/3 or more of the season remaining.If she keeps shooting 50% and if she stays healthy, she will easily break--even shatter that record.
And if she comes back for a 5th year as is rumored, she might make the career record. She was at 183 and 13th on the all time list before this season. Kianna Williams leads with 311. She could add a couple hundred to her 183 with two seasons. I doubt she can catch Kiana this year, though.
Jump would need 91 more 3's to catch Kiana. At her current 3 pointer-made rate she could tie Kiana if, for example, 1) she could keep up her rate of one made 3 for every 7.9 minutes, 2) Stanford made it to the National Championship game, and 3) her minutes increased from her current average of 26.7 minutes per game to 27.8 minutes per game. Not totally out of the realm of possibility.
(12-04-2022, 08:32 PM)81alum Wrote:Kiana played 4332 minutes for Stanford. Jump has played less than half that so far (1911). Kianna averaged a made 3 pointer for every 13.9 minutes of playing time. Jump has averaged a 3 pointer every 8.7 minutes (one every 7.9 minutes so far this season).(12-04-2022, 07:44 PM)jonnyss Wrote: thank you. in the past 5 years, stanford has played between 33 and 36 games in a season, so hannah likely has 2/3 or more of the season remaining.If she keeps shooting 50% and if she stays healthy, she will easily break--even shatter that record.
And if she comes back for a 5th year as is rumored, she might make the career record. She was at 183 and 13th on the all time list before this season. Kianna Williams leads with 311. She could add a couple hundred to her 183 with two seasons. I doubt she can catch Kiana this year, though.
Jump would need 91 more 3's to catch Kiana. At her current 3 pointer-made rate she could tie Kiana if, for example, 1) she could keep up her rate of one made 3 for every 7.9 minutes, 2) Stanford made it to the National Championship game, and 3) her minutes increased from her current average of 26.7 minutes per game to 27.8 minutes per game. Not totally out of the realm of possibility.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »