01-13-2014, 08:11 PM
...Channel, or at least they're trying to do so. The Weather Channel and its website are taking on DirecTV in a campaign the likes of which I have never seen. Here's a quote from http://www.weather.com/
"For over 30 years, The Weather Channel has been the most trusted resource for disseminating timely information to help prepare and protect families across the nation against weather-related emergencies. But now DIRECTV is threatening to remove this critical life-saving community resource from 20 million households."
Why do I bring this up? I'm asking the media/media studies folks on this board whether or not this battle could have any effect whatsoever on the up-to-now fruitless Pac-12 negotiations with DirecTV.
To put it another way: For whom should we cheer?
"For over 30 years, The Weather Channel has been the most trusted resource for disseminating timely information to help prepare and protect families across the nation against weather-related emergencies. But now DIRECTV is threatening to remove this critical life-saving community resource from 20 million households."
Why do I bring this up? I'm asking the media/media studies folks on this board whether or not this battle could have any effect whatsoever on the up-to-now fruitless Pac-12 negotiations with DirecTV.
To put it another way: For whom should we cheer?
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)


![[Image: chart-of-the-day-pay-tv-subscribers-march-2012.jpg]](http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/4f55247feab8eaf55e00000b/chart-of-the-day-pay-tv-subscribers-march-2012.jpg)