01-29-2015, 09:41 AM
Love is an altogether different guy than Young, IMO. He's shorter, but more powerfully built, and seems to run with a low pad level to break tackles. If Love is not markedly more productive at Stanford than Young I will be shocked.
Other thoughts...Â
Buncom and Meeks don't have to be burners to cover bigger WRs given their size and physicality, and Buncom has great position versatility.Â
If Edwards, Buncom, Reid, and Meeks all sign with Stanford, that's NINE DBs in two years. There will be secondary depth like Stanford has never had.
Edwards seems like the prototype SS, but he mentioned playing FS in his interview. Maybe that was before Reid became an option, because clearly Reid is a FS.
Stanford coaches are going to have to recruit OL and DL like they are going out of style in the 2016 class!
Other thoughts...Â
Buncom and Meeks don't have to be burners to cover bigger WRs given their size and physicality, and Buncom has great position versatility.Â
If Edwards, Buncom, Reid, and Meeks all sign with Stanford, that's NINE DBs in two years. There will be secondary depth like Stanford has never had.
Edwards seems like the prototype SS, but he mentioned playing FS in his interview. Maybe that was before Reid became an option, because clearly Reid is a FS.
Stanford coaches are going to have to recruit OL and DL like they are going out of style in the 2016 class!