04-10-2015, 08:24 AM
Not sure why you categorize Randle as a guy who's been developed well by Dawkins. If anything I think he's been a bit of a disappointment. Randle's still more a pure scorer than he is an all-purpose point guard, and I don't see a ton of skills -- offensive or defensive -- that he didn't have as a freshman.
I'd put Nastic, Huestis and Fields as the "good work there!" examples of Dawkins's development. That's...not terribly good from an overall perspective. Particularly when Dawkins has been such a strong recruiter, Muir's protests notwithstanding. (Literally: Muir's protests are unable to stand.)
I'd put Nastic, Huestis and Fields as the "good work there!" examples of Dawkins's development. That's...not terribly good from an overall perspective. Particularly when Dawkins has been such a strong recruiter, Muir's protests notwithstanding. (Literally: Muir's protests are unable to stand.)