[TooMuchTV]

In addition, while I only watched the highlights of the U$€ match, it seemed like they conceded the winning put, which was also not a tap-in.  I can understand if the ball was literally on the lip of the cup, but given the point about nerves in match play, why would you concede any non-gimmee put late in a match?

Though not a tap-in, Danielson still had two shots at that distance, not one.

[TooMuchTV]

In addition, while I only watched the highlights of the U$€ match, it seemed like they conceded the winning put, which was also not a tap-in.  I can understand if the ball was literally on the lip of the cup, but given the point about nerves in match play, why would you concede any non-gimmee put late in a match?

Though not a tap-in, Danielson still had two shots at that distance, not one.