[chicard]

[quote author=chicard link=topic=12165.msg119360#msg119360 date=1432825865]
In addition, while I only watched the highlights of the U$€ match, it seemed like they conceded the winning put, which was also not a tap-in.  I can understand if the ball was literally on the lip of the cup, but given the point about nerves in match play, why would you concede any non-gimmee put late in a match?

Though not a tap-in, Danielson still had two shots at that distance, not one.
[/quote]


Did not know that -- that makes more sense.

[chicard]

[quote author=chicard link=topic=12165.msg119360#msg119360 date=1432825865]
In addition, while I only watched the highlights of the U$€ match, it seemed like they conceded the winning put, which was also not a tap-in.  I can understand if the ball was literally on the lip of the cup, but given the point about nerves in match play, why would you concede any non-gimmee put late in a match?

Though not a tap-in, Danielson still had two shots at that distance, not one.
[/quote]


Did not know that -- that makes more sense.