05-28-2015, 04:00 PM
halve, yes using ve, is a reference to playing the hole to a draw. A player can be "up" or "down" on any hole. If a player wins the first hole they are "1-up". Their opponent would be "1-down".
If that players wins 5 holes and loses 2 others, the would be "3-up".
If you are "2-up" with only "1" hole to play you can't lose. The contest stops. And you are declared the winner 2 & 1. 2-up with 1 to go.
Run the numbers a bit and you can see Stackhouse's odds of victory were not very good.
Ignore ties for a moment. Even if each hole was a 50-50 deal. She would have only had a 25% chance of winning both holes, and a 12.5% chance of doing that AND winning in extra holes. Of course, playing the same number of strokes as your opponent at a hole is very common. Given the Davis merely needed to "halve" either the 17th or 18th. The probability of a Davis victory after the 16th was probably well in excess of 95%.
I was all set to send those "they worked hard" & "they exceeded expectation" type messages. #107 was a true gift. And will be part of Stanford golf lore.
If that players wins 5 holes and loses 2 others, the would be "3-up".
If you are "2-up" with only "1" hole to play you can't lose. The contest stops. And you are declared the winner 2 & 1. 2-up with 1 to go.
Run the numbers a bit and you can see Stackhouse's odds of victory were not very good.
Ignore ties for a moment. Even if each hole was a 50-50 deal. She would have only had a 25% chance of winning both holes, and a 12.5% chance of doing that AND winning in extra holes. Of course, playing the same number of strokes as your opponent at a hole is very common. Given the Davis merely needed to "halve" either the 17th or 18th. The probability of a Davis victory after the 16th was probably well in excess of 95%.
I was all set to send those "they worked hard" & "they exceeded expectation" type messages. #107 was a true gift. And will be part of Stanford golf lore.

