[Rally]

[quote author=JPRI link=topic=12528.msg124835#msg124835 date=1439908066]
[quote author=Yvonne link=topic=12528.msg124834#msg124834 date=1439907931]
The new software does have a spelling checker, but that won't fix the there/their/they're, its/it's, and your/you're problems.

God forbid we should ever automate The Cardboard Grammar Police out of a job.
[/quote]

Since we're on the topic of police, strictly speaking, inadvertently substituting a homonyms or close-to homonyms are not grammar errors but tend to be among the more amusing errors, particularly when they have a degree of Freudian lingerie quality to them.
[/quote]

Like this?

[Rally]

[quote author=JPRI link=topic=12528.msg124835#msg124835 date=1439908066]
[quote author=Yvonne link=topic=12528.msg124834#msg124834 date=1439907931]
The new software does have a spelling checker, but that won't fix the there/their/they're, its/it's, and your/you're problems.

God forbid we should ever automate The Cardboard Grammar Police out of a job.
[/quote]

Since we're on the topic of police, strictly speaking, inadvertently substituting a homonyms or close-to homonyms are not grammar errors but tend to be among the more amusing errors, particularly when they have a degree of Freudian lingerie quality to them.
[/quote]

Like this?