[ThePassionOfTheChryst]

Let's suppose Sark has a few drinks after a practice or game at a local bar, then has an accident driving home where someone is injured.  Would the university be subject to civil litigation by the injured party if they knew he had a problem but took no action?

I am not a lawyer, but seems to me that treatment of some kind is a must-do as a risk mitigation.

Also not a lawyer but I would imagine the university would have no liability.  Sarkisian is an adult and his actions are his own.  Does the university have a moral obligation to get him help, if they know he has a problem?  I would say yes, but of course that is up for debate.  But as for a legal obligation?  I truly doubt it, but hopefully a resident attorney (of which I'm sure there is at least a small handful) can shed some light.

[ThePassionOfTheChryst]

Let's suppose Sark has a few drinks after a practice or game at a local bar, then has an accident driving home where someone is injured.  Would the university be subject to civil litigation by the injured party if they knew he had a problem but took no action?

I am not a lawyer, but seems to me that treatment of some kind is a must-do as a risk mitigation.

Also not a lawyer but I would imagine the university would have no liability.  Sarkisian is an adult and his actions are his own.  Does the university have a moral obligation to get him help, if they know he has a problem?  I would say yes, but of course that is up for debate.  But as for a legal obligation?  I truly doubt it, but hopefully a resident attorney (of which I'm sure there is at least a small handful) can shed some light.