[winflop]

Speaking of some of the PI calls, I am curious.  I think I recall at least one that was called against us in the second half on which there was absolutely no way the receiver could have ever even touched the ball.  Maybe I overlooked something (and my DVR was not working properly), but I didn't see any earlier contact that could have been construed to have impeded the receiver.  It's still true, is it not, that PI does not apply to an uncatchable pass?

I think that was one down the UCF sideline.  Replay showed that the reason it wasn't catchable was because the Stanford DB held the receiver back for 10-15 yards.  That's why it was called (and correctly IMnsHO).

[winflop]

Speaking of some of the PI calls, I am curious.  I think I recall at least one that was called against us in the second half on which there was absolutely no way the receiver could have ever even touched the ball.  Maybe I overlooked something (and my DVR was not working properly), but I didn't see any earlier contact that could have been construed to have impeded the receiver.  It's still true, is it not, that PI does not apply to an uncatchable pass?

I think that was one down the UCF sideline.  Replay showed that the reason it wasn't catchable was because the Stanford DB held the receiver back for 10-15 yards.  That's why it was called (and correctly IMnsHO).