[washingtonismoney]

[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=13045.msg133390#msg133390 date=1444335425]
[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=13045.msg133387#msg133387 date=1444335149]
I think it was Ben Muth who was arguing there's more zone blocking, or more shotgun running (e.g. increased usage of buck sweeps) than before, and less of the Power O bread-and-butter. But this is not what I suspect teejers means by better playcalling.

I would love to see the detailed analysis that broke down our runs by whether it went between the tackles or outside the tackles.  We had that for the Under Stanford Control game (because some Trojan went through each play on video and did the breakdown), but unfortunately that sort of stat isn't widely available.
[/quote]

Do you still have a link for that analysis (i.e. the Trojan going through each play)?

There is definitely more shot gun running and seems to be more zone blocking schemes. I don't think there is necessarily any more running wide (at least since last year where we did quite a bit of that - not generally effectively). There's also quite a bit of pulling, though not necessarily classic Power. This OL has some issues, but they seem to be pretty athletic and can move - occasionally with issues finding someone to hit after moving but that seems to be getting much better.
[/quote]

Here's some of the super-long-box scores for Stanford:

@NW: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2015/9/...tats-recap
vs. Arizona: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2015/10...tats-recap
@ SC: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2015/9/...tats-recap

Sadly it appears those are the only three games available with such in-depth analysis; I'm sure it's a ton of effort so it's hard to pout too deeply.

EDIT: found northwestern

[washingtonismoney]

[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=13045.msg133390#msg133390 date=1444335425]
[quote author=washingtonismoney link=topic=13045.msg133387#msg133387 date=1444335149]
I think it was Ben Muth who was arguing there's more zone blocking, or more shotgun running (e.g. increased usage of buck sweeps) than before, and less of the Power O bread-and-butter. But this is not what I suspect teejers means by better playcalling.

I would love to see the detailed analysis that broke down our runs by whether it went between the tackles or outside the tackles.  We had that for the Under Stanford Control game (because some Trojan went through each play on video and did the breakdown), but unfortunately that sort of stat isn't widely available.
[/quote]

Do you still have a link for that analysis (i.e. the Trojan going through each play)?

There is definitely more shot gun running and seems to be more zone blocking schemes. I don't think there is necessarily any more running wide (at least since last year where we did quite a bit of that - not generally effectively). There's also quite a bit of pulling, though not necessarily classic Power. This OL has some issues, but they seem to be pretty athletic and can move - occasionally with issues finding someone to hit after moving but that seems to be getting much better.
[/quote]

Here's some of the super-long-box scores for Stanford:

@NW: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2015/9/...tats-recap
vs. Arizona: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2015/10...tats-recap
@ SC: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2015/9/...tats-recap

Sadly it appears those are the only three games available with such in-depth analysis; I'm sure it's a ton of effort so it's hard to pout too deeply.

EDIT: found northwestern