[stupac2]

Just saw a guy on the Ca.l board - who claims a 37-20 record ATS this year & doesn't let Stanford hate blind his judgment like so many of his ilk do -  say Stanford will "absolutely crush WSU and cover (-13) easily."  So there is that.

I mean, does anyone here think this will be even a two-score game? WSU is allowing 0.4 ypa more rushing than UCLA, while posting basically an identical ypp on offense (and that's with UCLA playing a much harder schedule, #22 vs #61). I know that we're going to be afraid of pretty much every remaining game because that's what we do, but this team really ought to stomp WSU. It seems that the only way WSU beats that spread is a garbage time score or two.

[stupac2]

Just saw a guy on the Ca.l board - who claims a 37-20 record ATS this year & doesn't let Stanford hate blind his judgment like so many of his ilk do -  say Stanford will "absolutely crush WSU and cover (-13) easily."  So there is that.

I mean, does anyone here think this will be even a two-score game? WSU is allowing 0.4 ypa more rushing than UCLA, while posting basically an identical ypp on offense (and that's with UCLA playing a much harder schedule, #22 vs #61). I know that we're going to be afraid of pretty much every remaining game because that's what we do, but this team really ought to stomp WSU. It seems that the only way WSU beats that spread is a garbage time score or two.