11-01-2015, 12:33 AM
(11-01-2015, 12:31 AM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=martyup link=topic=13438.msg138625#msg138625 date=1446362952]
[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=13438.msg138605#msg138605 date=1446360958]
[quote author=martyup link=topic=13438.msg138604#msg138604 date=1446360784]
On their last drive, they were running the ball with success.
NO, they did not. They ran it twice, and got two yards. 0 yards on third and 1 (they then made it on fourth and 1 on a throw), and then they ran for two yards on the last play before the missed field goal.
Did you mean the touchdown drive before? The ran it five times for 26 yards, though on consecutive plays they ripped runs of 9, 6 and 6 yards. But then they ran for 3 and 2 yards.
BC
[/quote]
Yes, I mean their last drive when they had the lead and only about 3 minutes were left on the clock. The drive that ended with Meeks' pick.
[/quote]
1st and 10 at WSU 28
(4:54 - 4th) Gerard Wicks run for 3 yds to the WshSt 31
2nd and 7 at WSU 31
(4:10 - 4th) Gerard Wicks run for 4 yds to the WshSt 35
3rd and 3 at WSU 35
(3:51 - 4th) STANFORD Penalty, Defensive Holding (10 Yards) to the WshSt 45 for a 1ST down
1st and 10 at WSU 45
(3:33 - 4th) Luke Falk pass incomplete to Dom Williams
2nd and 10 at WSU 45
(3:27 - 4th) Luke Falk pass intercepted Quenton Meeks return for 9 yds to the WshSt 39
Two runs for 7 yards isn't exactly "running the ball with success".
BC
[/quote]
You're right. It must have been the fog of war. But, I still think Leach screwed the pooch with his clock management.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.