[stupac2]

Interesting that they feel it weights more wins against .500+ more importantly than wins against elite teams.  That should help us in a comparison against a Big12 team.

As for us, NW, ND, UCLA are already over .500, Under Stanford Control and Oregon are at .500 but very likely to end over .500, Wazzou pretty likely (game against Colorado).  That puts us at 6.  UCF and OSU are no-gos.  Low APR U, UW, UA, and Colorado all are still alive to do it; Low APR U is most likely to reach against OSU.  Hard to tell with the rest.  Do we know if .500+ also means at .500, or does it need to be a winning record?

According to this it's only wins against teams above .500 and losses to teams below .500 that are specifically tallied. But yes, if we're in contention this would probably help us, even in a relative down year for the Pac-12 there are still plenty of good teams, especially compared to the Big 12 and ACC.

[stupac2]

Interesting that they feel it weights more wins against .500+ more importantly than wins against elite teams.  That should help us in a comparison against a Big12 team.

As for us, NW, ND, UCLA are already over .500, Under Stanford Control and Oregon are at .500 but very likely to end over .500, Wazzou pretty likely (game against Colorado).  That puts us at 6.  UCF and OSU are no-gos.  Low APR U, UW, UA, and Colorado all are still alive to do it; Low APR U is most likely to reach against OSU.  Hard to tell with the rest.  Do we know if .500+ also means at .500, or does it need to be a winning record?

According to this it's only wins against teams above .500 and losses to teams below .500 that are specifically tallied. But yes, if we're in contention this would probably help us, even in a relative down year for the Pac-12 there are still plenty of good teams, especially compared to the Big 12 and ACC.