11-22-2015, 01:45 AM
(11-22-2015, 12:34 AM)fullmetal link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=13700.msg142899#msg142899 date=1448175287]
Amazing; I have never seen such a disparity between yardage and score that didn't involve turnovers.
1st downs: Low APR U 23; Stanford 16
Total yards: Low APR U 495; Stanford 356
Time of possession: Low APR U 31:16, Stanford 28:44
You'd think Low APR U would have won it 35-22. The difference is that Low APR U settled for field goals; we got touchdowns (the Oregon game in reverse), and that guy named McCaffrey with a KOR for a TD.
BC
Does the total yards included the KOR yardage?
Bend-don't-break...requires patience and nerves of steel. Glad the right time employed the right strategy. I thought the Hogan run with three to go was dumb...OL isn't that good at zone blocking or blocking while running laterally. North-south for these guys. kal did figure out the jumbo power/short-yardage package one too many times for my liking. Not as much play-action as I would have liked. But it was a solid win, and we did it without some key players.
BTHO the south benders.
[/quote]
We ran the jumbo power/short yardage package four times and picked up two first downs and two touchdowns (though one was by the hair of our chinny chin chin). We struggled a few times in the non-super-jumbo package, but it's really hard to say that we struggled with the running game in a game where we gained 260 yards on the ground.
BC
