[CornFed]

[quote author=stupac2 link=topic=13922.msg146733#msg146733 date=1449551280]
[quote author=ThePassionOfTheChryst link=topic=13922.msg146729#msg146729 date=1449550549]
Anyone else getting irked by people qualifying McCaffrey's record?  "It took him two more games..."  He broke the record early in the 2nd quarter, iirc, so it took him just over one additional game, but he still did it on fewer touches.

I am kind of amazed that for all the "he took more games" talk, it took me until after the CCG to hear that it actually took fewer touches. Why wasn't that being used all the time as a counterpoint to the "more games" talk?
[/quote]

And I don't like promoting him as a running back.  He is an EVERYTHING back.  But, water over the dam.  Votes are in.
[/quote]

You're absolutely right.  Regardless of how things turn out next Saturday, next year we should promote him as an OMNI-back or a hybrid back; something to highlight his multi-dimensionality. 

[CornFed]

[quote author=stupac2 link=topic=13922.msg146733#msg146733 date=1449551280]
[quote author=ThePassionOfTheChryst link=topic=13922.msg146729#msg146729 date=1449550549]
Anyone else getting irked by people qualifying McCaffrey's record?  "It took him two more games..."  He broke the record early in the 2nd quarter, iirc, so it took him just over one additional game, but he still did it on fewer touches.

I am kind of amazed that for all the "he took more games" talk, it took me until after the CCG to hear that it actually took fewer touches. Why wasn't that being used all the time as a counterpoint to the "more games" talk?
[/quote]

And I don't like promoting him as a running back.  He is an EVERYTHING back.  But, water over the dam.  Votes are in.
[/quote]

You're absolutely right.  Regardless of how things turn out next Saturday, next year we should promote him as an OMNI-back or a hybrid back; something to highlight his multi-dimensionality.