ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team

Hank 91
Senator

Posts: 2,390
Threads: 336
Joined: Dec 1969

#15

08-27-2011, 04:25 PM

Thanks, I did mean Ryan Whalen. And yes, Ertz caught at least two touchdowns in the spring game, but Toilolo is my favorite. I can't wait to see how they use him in the red zone, forcing matchups against much smaller cornerbacks. These tight ends are going to be exciting to watch.

Please clear the field! The game is not over!

#15

Hank 91

08-27-2011, 04:25 PM

Thanks, I did mean Ryan Whalen. And yes, Ertz caught at least two touchdowns in the spring game, but Toilolo is my favorite. I can't wait to see how they use him in the red zone, forcing matchups against much smaller cornerbacks. These tight ends are going to be exciting to watch.

Please clear the field! The game is not over!

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by Griffins78 - 08-26-2011, 04:44 PM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by Farm93 - 08-26-2011, 08:14 PM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by oman - 08-26-2011, 10:23 PM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by yvonne - 08-26-2011, 10:28 PM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by oman - 08-26-2011, 10:45 PM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by Rando - 08-27-2011, 02:32 AM

This is just a version of an old game - by Redrum - 08-27-2011, 07:54 AM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by oman - 08-27-2011, 08:42 AM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by CowboyIndian - 08-27-2011, 08:49 AM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by washingtonismoney - 08-27-2011, 09:20 AM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by Pastor - 08-27-2011, 10:32 AM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by Hank 91 - 08-27-2011, 12:32 PM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by CowboyIndian - 08-27-2011, 01:16 PM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by fullmetal - 08-27-2011, 02:35 PM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by Hank 91 - 08-27-2011, 04:25 PM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by washingtonismoney - 08-27-2011, 05:47 PM

Re: ESPN, Ed Cunningham says without Luck Stanford is not better than a .500 team - by CowboyIndian - 08-27-2011, 06:01 PM

View a Printable Version