That's my point. Strict constructionism does not require the Senate to approve a nominee. I've heard a number of leftists argue that the Constitution mandates approval of Obama's nominee. So they want to use an inaccurate strict interpretation of the Constitution to argue that the Senate is obligated to confirm any Obama nominee, despite the fact that the nominee will most assuredly be a judicial activist.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.